جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « eblis » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

Human perceptions of phenomena in the word and influenced the discourse. Approach to critical discourse analysis in creating effective access relations provides good models for the study of language¸ ideologies and power relations between decoding and explained constructive dialogue between the text and the perspective of social، political، and how they deal with competing discourses reveals، is important. This descriptive- analytical approach to discourse analysis، explicate and analysis of the discursive formation used by Abd al-Rahmān Ibn Jawzi in his book ''Talbis-e-EbLis'' against sufis. Community based study of ‘‘Talbis-e- EbLis'' certifying a net work of meaning- text relations، provides the possibility of challenging the dominant discourse of comprehensive change in established concept system. Discourse analysis of the tenth chapter of ''Talbis-e- EbLis'' with highlighting، reduction، margining، misperception، regime of truth. Mechanisms and verbal strategies indicate that Ibn Jawzi extension، generalizations، and in a hostile intellectual atmosphere which was boost by the two poles of religion and power stealthily، has order tobe blasphemous and evil dominate the thoughts، actions، and words of sufis.

Sufis’s view with regard to Eblis is one of most controversial and at the same time the most engaging subjects that is reflected in their most important texts. On one hand, one is faced with radical beliefs speaking of rejection of devil and his condemnation from the God’s providence and on the other hand some of the key figures in the sufi world with their various interpretations in defence of Eblis or at least regarding his refusal to obey Adam, made their best to regard him as manifestation of love and bravery.
This article is concerned with the study of the views of the great sufi figures regarding Eblis with emphasis on the ideological foundations of such renowned characters as Hallaj, Ahmad Ghazali, Ayn al-Qudat Hamedani, Attar Neishabouri, and Moulana Jalal al-Din Mohammad Balkhi.

If we consider Hosseyn ibn Mansour Hallāj as the founder of the theory of defending Satan, no doubt, ‘Eyn al-Qozāt Hamadāni will be the unique interpreter and developer of this theory. He owes to Hallāj for the bases of this theory, but he presents such a new and innovative explanation of Satan‘s banishment and damnation that makes him one of the greatest defenders and adorers of Satan. Relying on Hamadāni‘s views, this article deals with a general view of Satan in Hamadani‘s works and an explanation of his principles for defending this banished rebel. In hamadāni‘s works, Satan has a dual face; one is the face of a deceiving tempter of human beings. The other is the face drawn during his adoring and defending of Satan. From his viewpoint, Satan is an experienced lover who rebelled against the beloved‘s order to show his perfection and to prove to the world that he and only he was aware of God‘s true will in this order which was the rebel of His thousand-year old lover from prostrating other than Him.