جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « elementary jihad » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

The problem of initiating a war in Islam is important from two aspects; On the one hand, a document has been issued for extremist groups to tarnish the face of Islam by promoting violence, and on the other hand, suspicions have been raised, especially by Orientalists, to challenge the truth and success of the Islamic religion. This article examines two recent and effective interpretations in a descriptive-analytical way. Al-Manar and Al-Mizan discussed this and came to the conclusion that both interpretations are in a way indicative of the war-initiating phenomenon in Islam, but at the same time, in response to doubts, they mentioned some conditions for it to find its real case and show its defensive nature. In the criticism of these two approaches, by following the use of the words Jihad and Qital and the like in the Holy Qur'an, it becomes clear that though the principle is not to initiate a war, and in the case of spreading religion and the supporting the monotheistic government, the principle is peace and agreement of the people, but as the legitimacy of the government, from the perspective of the Holy Quran, comes only from God and the only Divine rule should be dominant, in the case of the power of the monotheistic community and the fronting of the leaders of disbelief and tyranny against the spread of religion and the achievement of a global monotheistic government, initiating Jihad is lawful and as it is clear, its nature would be defensive.

It is not possible to understand the contemporary field of Najaf without knowing the school of Ayatollah Khoei. Without claiming to be an independent madrasa, Ayatollah Khoei is undoubtedly the owner of the madrasah, which has bound the entire area to himself in this period. This school has general and special trends that each of the students of this school are in a way the guardian and expander of these trends. The general approach of this school is to avoid politics and engage full-time in Islamic sciences; And its special approach is temporary entry - according to necessity and emergency - in political affairs. Examining the works and social practice of many contemporary jurists of Najaf shows that they are strongly bound to the general and specific approach of this school and even those who live outside Najaf still define themselves along this school. What are the general and special trends of this school? The answer to this question is the main mission of this article. An answer that has received less attention in Persian literature.

Jihad is one of the important Islamic pillars that to be noticed in Quran and Traditions of Imams. Therefore commentators and lawyers write about this very much. Lawyers and many primitive commentators approve 2 kinds of jihad even some of them behoove 2 kinds of jihad. Elementary jihad and defensive jihad. In 2 recent century for important subjects that humans encounter with them for example freedom of opinion, a group of commentator deny elementary jihad and another group accept that implicitly then analyze the fact of elementary jihad because they want to solve the contrast between elementary jihad and freedom of opinion and explicate elementary jihad to 4 kinds of defensive jihad. . 1- Elementary jihad for defensive of humanities nature. 2- Elementary jihad as advance far. 3- Elementary jihad for removing of obstacles in guidance way or Liberator jihad. 4. Elementary jihad as denying superstition.This research deals with for views or theories in descriptive an analytical method and don’t know any of them completely. Because they could not solve the mention contrast comprehensively.

One of the most important jurisprudential and interpretive categories of Islam is jihad. The need for defensive jihad is obvious; Because defense is a natural right; However, the legitimacy of the initial jihad and its conditions, especially in the era of continuous absence, has been controversial, and due to which widespread accusations have been leveled against Islam by some Orientalists and opponents. Hence, the importance and necessity of addressing this issue is becoming more apparent at the present time. Some Shiite and Sunni scholars have denied the basic jihad in Islam, including the late Salehi Najafabadi. He has rejected the primary jihad for various reasons, including the denial of the absolute verses of jihad in the Holy Qur’an, the application of the principle of absolute rule in such verses, and the citation of the Prophet’s biography. This research, while examining general views in this field, has explained his theory. The method of data collection in this research is library and the research method is descriptive-analytical.

In the Islamic and international legal system, interference in the internal affairs of states is prohibited based on the principle of non-interference. An exception has been made based on principles and criteria according to this principle. This study examines the most important principles of the legitimacy of intervention from the Islamic point of view on referring to jurisprudential and legal sources to explain and develop the concept of intervention by mentioning similar cases in the international legal system. The purpose of this study is to make greater compliance and interaction of the principles of intervention legitimacy with the existing laws in the international legal system and the emerging issues in the world today. This study is introduced principles of human dignity, the jihad of invitation, defense of the other people, and the principle of collective security, defensive jihad or legitimate defense and intervention according to the invitation or contract as the most important principles of the legitimacy of intervention by using descriptive, and analytical study.

In international law, any threat or use of force is prohibited and there are only two major exceptions to it. One is the right to self-defense and another is military operation to maintain or restore international peace and security. On the other hand, the misconception of the teachings of Islam on Jihad has led to the emergence of Jihadi Takfiri sects. They believe in Elementary Jihad with an ideological purpose; this is in clear contradiction with international regulations. This article is structured through a descriptive-analytic method and of a library based approach and the question of the research is comparing the international standards with ayahs of Qur'an in the field of Jihad in order to determine their conformity. Considering the ayahs related to Jihad confirms the legitimacy and the need for defensive jihad. Defense in its general meaning that has some proponents in contemporary international law has a broad scope and embraces many of the wars which have been regarded as Elementary Jihad in Islamic history and jurisprudence. The results of this article demonstrate a kind of consistency between the material of ayahs of Qur'an and international law as to war and peace.