جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "global order" در نشریات گروه "علوم انسانی"

The main question of the present study is why do governments adhere to global norms? In this study, using descriptive-analytical method, the authors examine the adherence of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia to global norms by using three explanatory variables of legitimacy between domestic and foreign norms. International countries have reviewed. Findings show that among the explanatory variables affecting the Islamic Republic of Iran's exposure to global norms, the variable of proportionality between domestic and foreign norms has the greatest impact on Iran's acceptance or non-acceptance of global norms and the other two variables are legitimizing the frameworks of world order. And the consequences of how to face the norms for the international image of the country are influential in the next level and all three act as obstacles to the acceptance of international norms due to the special situation of the Islamic Republic of Iran rather than facilitating the acceptance of international norms. . On the other hand, in the case of Saudi Arabia, the variable of proportionality between domestic and foreign norms can potentially play a role of undermining global norms, but the other two variables, legitimizing the framework of world order and the consequences of how to deal with norms, facilitate the international image of the country. They are very effective and pave the way for the acceptance of global norms for Saudi Arabia.

In the idea of interacting with the United States, globalization is considered as a spontaneous phenomenon which is accelerated by the great powers. Progress and welfare are achieved through being part of the global village and globalization. Each country benefits from globalization if it can prove its convergence with the global system. Globalization demands changes in economic, political and cultural structures. In the process of the integration of the global economy, capital is likely to go towards those areas of the world that meet the standards of global order. Major criteria for the global order are as follows: abandoning tension with Israel, reducing the power of the traditional part of the sovereignty, separating religion from politics, reducing military costs, and resigning from the leadership of the South. Using a descriptive-analytical method, the present article seeks to explicate the view of interaction with the United States and criticize it.