جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "روابط اقتصادی" در نشریات گروه "تاریخ"

The in-depth rooted and protracted relations between Iran and China flourished in the Mongols and Timurids era,which included various political, economic, cultural, and artistic aspects. Many of the continuation requirements of the diverse relations between Iran and China were lost in the early 10th/16th century due to their political and economic situation, changing the political geography of Asia, the emergence of new powers between the two lands, altering their balance of political and economic forces in the world,and increasing influence of Europeans around Iran and China.The relations between Iran and China were not focused on by the rulers and elites of the two lands during the Safavid dynasty(907-1135 AH)unlike the mentioned rulers. Despite the significant changes and degradation in the types and quality of relations between these two countries during the Safavid era,some aspects and types of relations between Iran and China were limitedly maintained.Maintaining this type of relationship was due to preserving the previous contexts and affecting the heritage of the relations between the two lands and some economic necessities.This descriptive-analytical study aimed to evaluate the relations between Iran and China during the Safavid period using scattered information and few historical, literary,scientific,and artistic references.The results indicated that these relations were mainly in economic, scientific, and artistic fields. The rulers and elites of Iran more or less considered China and its civilizational and cultural achievements during the Safavid era by maintaining these types of relations and radiating the long-standing and rich heritage of the past relations between the two lands.

The political structure in every civilization and country has a positive relationship with the country’s dominant economic grounds and relationships. Absolute monarchy as a sort of political structure, being dominant in Europe in 15th to 17th century, is not an exception. To explicate the reasons of forming such a structure in Europe in that period, one should explore the material and historical developments that made it inevitable. Absolute monarchy can be considered a non-democratic political structure whcis based on non-personal law and regulations. The aim of such monarchy was centralizing power and creating a unitary governance in a specific territory in order to facilitate economical and commercial issues. Using narration analysis method and investigating the history of Europe in the past decades, this study reports shortly the history of political structure in Europe and then explores the material and historic grounds of the formation of absolute monarchy, the reasons of forming such a political structure, the concept of enlightened authoritarianism, and its characteristics. The main hypothesis of the study was the centrality of trading in Europe civilization and the influence of trade and economy on other parts of the civilization of the continent, including culture, politics, from economic and commercial issues. Therefore, the author believes that the purpose of absolute monarchy explored and discussed in this study was facilitating and helping trade and economic issues in different counties of Europe, especially in Western Europe.

The industrial development of the country had been one of the most crucial issues for Reza Shah. He along with his political consultants and executives tried to take advantage of states which had less threaten to Iran's national interest for reducing economic pressure on society. Hence, due to the lack of having a colonial background in the Middle East and the availability of sufficient funds and technical advisers, Germany was considered the best option for cooperation with Iran in the period. This article, it is tried to answer the main question about the role of Germany in the economic progress of Iran between the two World Wars by enjoying the historical method and descriptive-analytical approach and using library resources. In answer to the question, it is supposed that Germany had played a significant  role in the development of the economic development of Iran between the two world wars.

The Iran-Iraq war affected the future relations of the Islamic Republic of Iran with many countries. Most of the countries in the region immediately supported Iraq, but the UAE's two-sided positions between the two involved countries seem to have been linked to the country's vast ties with the Iran. The research seeks to examine the role of economic relations in terms of the political commitment of the UAE to Iran over the war period. The results seem to be useful for building better relationships with the countries of the region in today's world. So, the economic relations between the two countries affected the extent of the political commitment of the UAE against Iran. Our assumption is that economic relations have increased the political commitment of the UAE against Iran. In this paper, the research method is descriptive and is based on library studies and periodical publications. The two countrie's views on issues such as the opposition to the presence of foreigners in the region, the frequent visits of their officials, and the opposition to the UAE by cutting off the relationship between the Arabs and Iran are among the signs of a growing political commitment of the United Arab Emirates to the Islamic Republic of Iran at the international level.

Following the breakup of the Great Seljuq Empire, the descendants of Soleiman ben Ghatlemish (a branch of Seljuqs’ royal family) exerted control over some parts of Asia Minor and founded the Seljuk Dynasty. The dynasty, much like most of eastern Islamic rules, could not withstand the massive Mongol invasions and were ultimately subjugated to the Ilkhanates. Rich natural resources in Anatolia and its vast revenues drove the Ilkanate relations with the semi-independent state of Rum Seljuqs towards economic grounds. This economic approach affected other areas of mutual relations, in a way that the Rum Seljuqs lost their political independence in the beginning and later on their bureaucratic and economic control waned and by the 8th century (Hijri calendar) they had given way to the Turk invaders. The nature of economic relations with the Ilkhanates affected the social and political situation in Asia Minor

Following the revival of Germany as a great power in Europe, Nazis needed to have strong economic base, and so developed relations with Iran. Development in the relations of two countries was welcomed by Allied Powers. Iran, in its turn, saw it as a means to alter influence of Russia and Great Britain, and bring political development and industrialization to the country. Before WW¬II, they went much further in developing the relationship to the level of forming an strategic alliance. It brings us this question: what was Germany’s main aim in developing relations with Iran, and how did they intend to achieve that goal? The same aim were propelled. As a working hypothesis, the article supposes that Germany had come to develop a sphere of influence through economic and cultural means.

Possessing the same ethnic and historical roots, Iranians and Indians have held relations with each other since ancient times. Towards the beginning of the 10th century A.H. and along with the rising power of Safavids in Persia, the successors of Timur the Lame with aid from the Safavid kings took over most of India. Throughout the larger part of their reigns, these two dynasties maintained close friendly relations with each other and had mutual influence on developments in one another’s domains.This paper deals with the depth and expanse of these relations in the political, cultural and economic areas.