جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « ستاره شناسی » در نشریات گروه « تاریخ »

Historiography cannot be properly studied and understood without the influence of other sciences or social and political spheres. The importance of this issue is due to the study of Mulla Jalal Manjemizadi's historiographical insight in the history of Abbasi (Mullah Jalal newspaper), a small part of the cultural life of Iran and especially the Safavid era (1135-1905 AH). It makes it clear. Since Mulla Jalal's historiography and historiography is based on principles that we have rarely seen in Iranian historiography. Based on this, it can be said that in the history of Abbasi (Mulla Jalal newspaper), the components of acceptability, legitimacy and legitimacy are based on cosmic and astronomical explanations as well as religious beliefs, which make this work one of the other works. Asr Safavi has distinguished. Therefore, it seems necessary to be aware of Mulla Jalal's historical vision and thought in recognizing the historical developments of this period. Accordingly, the authors have tried to analyze the relationship between historical facts and astronomy, astronomy and cosmology, and doctrinal thought in Mulla Jalal's historiographical insight into Abbasid history with a descriptive-analytical approach. . The claimant claims that: Although the idea of ​​Mulla Jalal's historiography in Abbasid history, like other sources gy, which included the court's astronomer, he linked history with astronomy and astronomy, the result of which was the use of the Qur'an in components such aon astronomy a linear history, promising, destiny-oriented and rationalist, and the need to observe the hours of Sa'd and Nahs have been crystallized. Is.

One of the important issues in the history of Iran (in Nasser-al-din Shah Qajar Era) is the opposition between the formation of new knowledge and technology and the preservation of the traditional knowledge and the reaction of the traditional science scholars. Epistemological foundations of a new civilization based on new scientific findings and on empirical methods in natural sciences through translations, with the traditional understanding of science and traditional means any knowledge and inductive method as a method for knowledge discovery was in contrast to the continuation of the Iranian traditional scientific approach. This contrast in various fields of science had occurred due to various aspects of Qajar era: clash between the traditional astronomers named “Monajem -al Dawlah” against the translators of the new science, traditional schools against the Dar-al-Fonun, and, traditional rejection of translation and writing in modern newspapers. These clashes marked a new era in the field of scientific modernity in Iran. Attempts made by social groups in the challenging field of science and ideology in the form of translations of modern science and traditional treatises can be investigated. The opposition between the new and the old astronomy and the new translation in the Nazareth era (18451896- A.C.), has been the subject of the present article. In this study, the content of translated texts on astronomy and the astronomy texts belonging to the dominant discourse of Qajar era will be challenged. In this essay, the historical method is the main method for the research. Based upon the sources published in the subject area, we are in search of the causal relations within historical conditions and we implement the history of ideas approach towards the opponents and the proponents of science and scientific methods.