جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « مالکیت ارضی » در نشریات گروه « تاریخ »

Ali Akbar Dehkhoda presented two different views - radical and moderate- in relation to the issue of land ownership in different issues of Sur-e Israfil newspaper. The main issue of the present study is to explain the dual reading of Dehkhoda from the category of land ownership. Dehkhoda in his early writings took a radical and socialist look Provides coverage of human and Islamic rights in relation to land ownership and speaks of the unconditional transfer of land to the subjects and considers its coercive realization through the reform project or, if necessary, through the possibility of a peasant revolution. However, in the following posts, take a modified look and, by accepting the property rights of the owners, He offered to transfer the property to the subjects in exchange for paying their price through the bank. The present study, based on Skinner's intentional hermeneutics, reveals the findings and points in response to the above problem. Characteristics of the dominant linguistic-discourse and intellectual-social space, including: Intensification of political tensions and alignment of proponents and opponents of the constitution, Discourse disputes between legitimacy and constitutionalism, Discourse disputes between legitimacy and constitutionalism, Attack on the office of the newspaper Sur-e Israfil and a delay of more than a month in its publication, Along with the approval of the Impressions Law and the establishment of a peace committee(In the presence of Jahangir Khan, the director of Sur-e Israfil) and request to stay away from extremism, Caused Dehkhoda to respond in this way.

The most important part of Iran's economy during the Nasri era was the land economy, because the most important part of the country's per capita income and the government's income were provided from this sector. In this article, land ownership in Lorestan and its changes according to the production methods that dominate the land economy of Lorestan. Nasri means the mode of economic production and capitalist mode of production as well as the conditions of production resulting from them in the land economy of this region have been examined by the method of historical study and an attempt has been made to answer this main question that the conditions of production and what was the ownership of the means of production in the land economy of Lorestan in the Nasrid era in both the mentioned production methods and which exploitation system was the dominant method of product distribution between the owner and the farmer? The results of the research It shows that in this region there were four types of ownership (tribal, private, khalsa and waqfi) in which the predominant method of exploitation was in the case of farm production (shareholding) and this exploitation system is the most important factor in preventing the possibility of The growth and development of production forces has been in the region.

Because of the craft downfall and reduction of silk export in the  Naseri era , it became clear that the economy of the country has profoundly affiliated to the the agricultural sector. Therefor,  land and land ownership became more significant.   As the result of some natural and economic factors, starvation spreads and farmers had to immigrate and lands were left dropped without any  water and cultivation.   Reduction of agricultural products, the occupation of lands by the government, or big landowners or attachment to endowments. Weakened the petty land owners and changed theming to day workers. Government became involved in financial crisis, because of famine and to relieve of this situation it started to selling the crown lands.   Selling the crown lands increased the price of corns and created a new class of landowner- merchants and increased the power and political influence of   big landownerships in the government.

After the conquest and settlement of the Arabs in Andolusia، the trend of turning the natures towards Islam began، and through the passage of time a remarkable number of them converted to Islam. The native Muslims of Andolusia were then known as the Musalemeh (new Muslinus) as well as their children who were brought up under the domination of Islam. Later on، they were called Mavalidan. In the late 2nd century and early 3rd century a. h. the nubmber of new Muslims increased، so that they surpassed the Arabs and formed most of the population of large cities such as TolayToleh، Sarghaeta، specially the border line areas. Converting to Islam، Mavalidan expected equal rights with the Arabs، but that important thing was not realized. Because the Umavid rulers and the Arab aristocrats، exerting the discriminating policies such as confiscation the fertile lands and imposing heavy taxes upon them، prevented them from reaching suitable economic، social، and political conditions، These measures had great effects on weakening Mavalidan''s economic status، so that they had to rebel and protest against the prevailing system of government. The present paper is an attempt to study the trend of land ownership and tax-imposing while explaining Mavalidan''s economic status.