جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "laclau" در نشریات گروه "تاریخ"

The disagreement and lack of conformity between the Umayyad and Ahl al-Bayt factions after Karbala event increased the grounds for discursive confrontation in both speech and action dimensions. This led, on the one hand, to a change in the dominant discourse structure of the Umayyads and, on the other hand, to a deepening of the achievements of the Karbala uprising. The aim of this study is to provide answers to the following questions, while presenting the Umayyad actions in facing Karbala, using the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe which considers the dimensions of discourse as both speech and behavior: “What are the reasons for the change in the dominant discourse of the two opposing factions?”, and “What strategies does the dominant discourse adopt to overcome this challenge?” The findings of the research show that the confusion of the stability of the meaning of the Umayyad discourse in a competitive environment with the Ahl al-Bayt discourse after Karbala caused the unrest of the Umayyad discourse and a change of practice from the dominant discourse to the discourse of interaction and appeasement in order to overcome the challenges of the threatened rule.

The various and sometimes different approaches and definitions in the study of Islamic art have complicated the study of it. Traditionalism and historical perspectives, the two dominant approaches in this branch, look at Islamic art differently. The base in traditionalism is on tradition and unchangeable principles, while in historical perspectives, it is history and its contexts. Traditionalists consider Islamic art to be the result of a grace that has flowed in the artist and embodied the teachings of perennial philosophy in the art works, but in the historical perspectives, the art works are the product of historical determinism and context. These differences have made the study of art works complicated even at prestigious festivals, and the various and conflicting criteria for judging works of Islamic art. This research, in a descriptive-analytical and discourse analysis method and a comparative approach, seeks to answer the questions; What is the discourse analysis of these two dominant approaches in Islamic art? And why, despite these two dominant discourses, there is no unity in the definition of Islamic art and its main features? and provide a basis for modifying a more comprehensive definition. Research findings include dissimilarity in discourse components, discourse creation, and sub-discourses.

During Reza Shah's reign, the discourse of authoritarian nationalism was formed and used in different fields. In 1317 A.H., an institution called the Organization of Cultivating Thoughts was established to promote and expand the ruling discourse in various arenas. Teachers were one of the groups that were trained by this organization. Using the discourse analysis theory of Laclau and Mouffe, this research aims to investigate the articulation, concepts and identification process of the discourse of authoritarian nationalism in the historical speeches of the Organization. The analysis of the speeches by the Organization of that period shows that the articulation of the concepts and components of the discourse of authoritarian nationalism in these speeches were made around the central sign of the Shah and that justify the foundations of Pahlavi rule.

Strength and stability of the Prophet (PBUH) to promote Islam, despite the continued exclusion of Quraysh, led to numerous debates between them and the leaders of the Quraysh. In this debate, interlocutors were trying to offer a different argument, the otherness of the other party claims and by creating a single meaning system, their discourse to spread in the community. Efforts to stabilize the semantic debate both sides to dialogue, lead to challenges in the context of the debate.
This paper is concerned with the use of discourse analysis theory of Laclau and Mouffe, who discussed the discourse further than linguistics, in political, cultural and social fields. The consequences show that monotheistic and polytheistic discourses continued to confront each other and as a result monotheistic discourse took advantage of the debate and broke the structure of polytheistic discourse in order to make itself more hegemonic

The purpose of the present paper is to focus on the eleventh year of the Islamic calendar in order to achieve a new reading of the Ridda / Apostasy movement and to prove that the Quraysh caliph had meant by Islam to address most of the Arabs living in the Arabian Peninsula. Due to the prominence and representation of the elements of politics and power, this study looks through a discursive lens on the subject, and accordingly the Quraysh discourse is analyzed within the theoretical framework of Laclau and Mouffe. Together with the documented demonstration of the agency and determinative influence of politics in the field of religion, especially in the mentioned period, the reading obtained in the framework of this theory of Islamic history and in connection with the disputed issue of apostasy proves that subjects of the Quraysh Islamic discourse had been literally enslaved (taslīm), not Muslim (i.e. one who surrenders). What confirms this claim is the variable and volatile definition of the dominant discourse relating to Islam and being a Muslim.