جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « nasser » در نشریات گروه « تاریخ »

Expansion of political, social and cultural center of the Abbasid caliphate in Baghdad Shiite domination of Buwayhid flourished and continued to fall in the process was also hampered Buwayhid. By the time of the Seljuk rule Tkapvhay Kharazmshahiyan This process was accelerated.Seems to be a growing political conflict After the fall of the Ghaznavid and Seljuk military Kharazmshahiyan the Abbasid Caliphate, the areas suitable for development activities at this time Shiite, has provided comprehensive. Establishment of religious schools, writing several works on jurisprudence and interpretation of Shiite scholars, Shiites in Turkish bureaucracy, even in official Turkish Sultans and Abbasid Caliphate, and special attention to the role of the Shia in the political equations in the time, The point of this article is to review and findings.Various Shia sects, and the interrelationships of the Abbasid Caliphate Kharazmshahiyan play an effective role. The issue, for various reasons in the face of the Abbasid Caliph al- Nasser Sultan Muhammad Kharazm is important.Regardless of which side of the Ismaili Shia Muslim caliphate and to be Kharazmshahiyan Ygrnd, other Shiites both have leading roles are.

Nationalizing the oil industry in Iran by Dr. Mosadegh is one the most important event in middle earth contemporary history in 1950s. This achievement was a big step for cutting the hand of imperialism from Iran and reaching national freedom which had inbound and regional and global reflections. The most evident reflection of this event was wiping the undefeatable face of imperialism in middle earth. Most effects of Iran unti-colonialism movement was on Egypt because Egyptians had tasted the bitterness of colonialism during centuries like Iran. So liberals in Egypt put Dr.Mosadegh as their model and tried harder to save their country from foreign colonialism and inbound dictatorship with more eagerness and desire and finally they succeeded to end monarchy and establish presidential government. This desire multiplied by ruling of Gen. Gamal Abdel Nasser. He, affected by Dr.Mosadegh, began to nationalize the Suez Canal which was vital artery of Egypt and was under control of Britain and France. This is obvious that this Gamal Abdel Nasser action was a continuation of Dr.Mosadegh action and was the second big defeat of colonialism

One of the important issues in the history of Iran (in Nasser-al-din Shah Qajar Era) is the opposition between the formation of new knowledge and technology and the preservation of the traditional knowledge and the reaction of the traditional science scholars. Epistemological foundations of a new civilization based on new scientific findings and on empirical methods in natural sciences through translations, with the traditional understanding of science and traditional means any knowledge and inductive method as a method for knowledge discovery was in contrast to the continuation of the Iranian traditional scientific approach. This contrast in various fields of science had occurred due to various aspects of Qajar era: clash between the traditional astronomers named “Monajem -al Dawlah” against the translators of the new science, traditional schools against the Dar-al-Fonun, and, traditional rejection of translation and writing in modern newspapers. These clashes marked a new era in the field of scientific modernity in Iran. Attempts made by social groups in the challenging field of science and ideology in the form of translations of modern science and traditional treatises can be investigated. The opposition between the new and the old astronomy and the new translation in the Nazareth era (18451896- A.C.), has been the subject of the present article. In this study, the content of translated texts on astronomy and the astronomy texts belonging to the dominant discourse of Qajar era will be challenged. In this essay, the historical method is the main method for the research. Based upon the sources published in the subject area, we are in search of the causal relations within historical conditions and we implement the history of ideas approach towards the opponents and the proponents of science and scientific methods.