جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « برجسته سازی » در نشریات گروه « تاریخ »

Discourse, as a system of signs, generally constructs individual and social behaviors. In every order of discourse, a collection of rules and conventions is stipulated in order to construct discourse principles. In regard to their ideological purposes, social actors tend to import signs into their discourse framework. Simultaneously, language as a significant constructive component appears and begins to establish the intended meaning of social actors in a soft manner. Thus Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, at an international level, utilizes language facilities for representing political facts. According to sociopolitical events and governing atmosphere, he attempts to establish signs in his discourse framework. In a semiotic model of this discourse framework, axiomatic signs are set into the center while the others are around the central point. Accordingly, this research focuses mainly on how foregrounding and backgrounding function in foreign policy discourse of Shah. Then in this way, hegemonic and dominant signs have been specified. Moreover, according to dominant discourse features, five periods are determined as follows: first period: 1320-1324, second period: 1325-1332, third period: 1333-1344, fourth period: 1345-1352, and fifth period: 1353-1356; furthermore, a discourse framework is determined for each period. The results show that notorious incidents occurred at certain junctures not only stir "self" and "other" identities within the realm of otherization, but it will also lead to alteration of shah's framework as well as displacement of signs.

Discourse analysis is the result of the interactions of the linguistic and non-linguistic, intellectual and cultural competences as well as the interaction or the opposition of the ideologies. It analyzes the inner layers in the text to achieve its deep meanings. Using a descriptive-analytic method, the present paper implements the discourse analysis based on the prominent orientation and the marginalization of the Van Dyke's ideological square to analyze the debates of Imam Reza (AS) and Catholicos while proving the issue of prophecy. In selecting the words, Imam (AS) has used vocabularies with deep semantic load and has implemented the linguistic implications to transfer the meaning. Therefore, the selection and order of the words and the various types of emphases and the opening and the destination of words played a significant role in highlighting the main concepts that Imam called for. Imam used some techniques that caused doubts or questioned the beliefs of the other party and in this way he marginalized the discourse.

Detailed description of events about uprising of Imam Hussein and it,s different dimensions is historiography of Abu mikhnaf. Although, some researchers have studied Abu mikhnaf,s status and his works in Islamic historiagraphy, But in the present paper, with relying on the theory of discourse analysis approach Laclau and Mouffe, Reflects the efforts of ruling discourse, for staying hegemony, in Report of the Battle of Karbala from Abu mikhnaf is taken into consideration.In conducted surverys, using from dominant discourse from foregrounding and backgrounding is represented in text, Either in the software (speeches and letters) or in the hardware (threat, create a suffocating, using of military force to neglect opposition with using the hegemonic interventions).He reflects legitimacy of the practices of the dominant discourse and utilizing various methods from telling lies, demagoguery and allure of the elders to otherness and emphasis on obedience to authority and dean thrust for preserving the authority of this discourse.