جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Baluchistan » در نشریات گروه « تاریخ »

Research in geographical names or "toponymy" research and the study of the reasons for naming places reveal different angles of a period of historical monuments for historians as well as geographers. Geographical names can be considered as living history because they have a historical background. Naturally, each naming is given a place for a reason or causes and can help researchers understand issues and clarify some ambiguities. Geographical names can indicate worldview, beliefs, culture, tastes, interests, aspirations, communication position, economic, military, historical event, or the like. Because geographical names change over time and their pronunciation and spelling may change, toponymy research can be used to research the original name and the scope of its changes. One of the most important settlements in the desert of Iran, which was once considered the only desert city and the passage of many world travelers, is the settlement of Nosrat Abad Espi, whose name has changed over the centuries and eras.

The social structure of the Baluchistan region can be considered a continuation of a part of the historical and cultural structure of Iran. Due to the rule of 'tradition' over social relations, in the ranks of the patrimonial state, the nomadic tribe is based on traditional action and the division of labor. The Baluchistan class system has historical data that represents the structure and method of agricultural production. The significance of this study is based on the important and decisive position of the class system in the social life of the people of Baluchistan. This research has been done using the descriptiveanalytical method and historical sociology (Ideal Weber method), relying on library resources and using sociological theories to identify and explain the causal conditions governing the structure of Baluchistan society and its social consequences. By studying the sociology and history of the structure of the social system of Baluchistan, the historical-social reasons have been the stability and continuity of the traditional class system, the traditional action and the method of agricultural production. The effects of social consequences such as migration, insecurity, discrimination against women, mass conflicts, class divisions, cultural delays, underdevelopment, and violation of civil rights of the poor and cultural stagnation have affected the people of this region.

Southeastern borders of Iran have always been one of the most striking frontiers due to its specific geographical and political features.The competition of the French, Russian and British governments over India prompted the British to seize access to India by separating Afghanistan from Iran as a buffer zone.The Goldsmid and Colonel Holdich Agreement was a turning point in the formation of southeastern frontiers, a government that did not have the power to resist British politics formed the joint committees of the Goldsmith and Colonel Heldich which resulted in thedelination of the borderwhich resulted in the division of sections of Balochistan. This paper is a descriptive-analytical one, relying on library sources, documents, and studies and with a historical-political approach to answer the question that the role of the British Government in the formation and development of Iranian borders played an important role in the southeast side.This paper by using descriptive-analytical methods, relying on documents and library resources with a historical-political approach to answer this question that what is the effective role of the British Government in the formation and development Iranian southeastern borders?The findings of the study shows that the Iranian authoroties ignorance of the legal implications of international political boundaries and the weak political and military structure of Iranian governments after Nader Shah.