جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "اصل هم نمایه سازی" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

This paper studies the semantic contribution of –e suffix based on Lieber (2004). This theory using seven semantic features and a principle called Coindexation Principle studies the semantic contribution of lexical items and their function in compounding, derivation and conversion. In this theory each lexical item even affixes have a semantic skeleton and a semantic body. Each affix has to have only one skeleton. If an affix has more than one semantic contribution, it should be explained based on other factors such as semantic extension conserving the same skeleton. Concepts such as subject, object, instrument, etc. have no relationship with skeleton but they are the result of other factors such as the interaction of coindexation of base argument with the argument of the affix. Having studied –e affix, we came to the following it has at least three semantic skeletons: one which derives concrete nouns, another one derives abstract nouns having event or process meaning, and adjectival one. Subject oriented and object oriented nouns, instrument, similarity and location are the result of semantic extension of concrete noun making function of the affix or different coindexation on the argument of the affix with different arguments of the base.

This paper examines the semantic contribution of -ār and -andeh suffixes in Persian based on Lieber’s (2004) lexical semantic representation. This framework using six semantic features ([material], [dynamic], [Location], [IEPS], [B] and [CI] and a principle called coordination principle studies the semantic contribution of lexical items including affixes and their functions in compounding, derivation and conversion. In this theory all lexical items including affixes have semantic skeleton, grammatical sub-categorization and arguments; but affixes have little or nothing of semantic body. This paper studies different functions of -ār and -andeh suffixes in the process of morphological derivation, their polysemy nature and, in general, the origins of their similarities and differences. Using this theory, it is shown that these affixes do not contribute to the semantic roles of agent and patient or the syntactic roles of object and subject but they, like other lexical items, add semantic features to the lexical bases and their polysemy is the result of different application of coordination principle, not their semantic contribution.

The present paper explores the semantic contribution of some affixes and verb stems (past and present) in sorani, a majo dialect of Kurdish.In the lexical semantic representation framework, affixes, like other lexical items, have semantic features, subcategories, arguments and semantic skeletons. In this framework, lexical items, including affixes, are defined by the following semantic features: ‌[material],[dynamic], [Location], [IEPS], [B] and [CI] and semantic skeletons are represented for them. Then the skeletons are put together and the argument of the affix is co-indexed with one of the arguments of the base to make a semantic unit that refers to one element. Here are the conclusions gained based on the theory: the contribution of present stems of simple verbs to creating new lexemes is much more than the contribution of past stems; some affixes have the same semantic skeletons and as a result they make the same semantic contribution and their different representation in new lexemes is related to other factors; lastly, contrary to our expectation, there exist some affixes in Sorani that have two semantic skeletons.