جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « تحلیل نحوی » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

Wasiyat" (testamentary wills) is one of the appropriate traditions which its importance and desirability has been emphasized in Holy Quran through different methods. However, recognizing its meaning and imperative rules, considering the declension (i’rab) analysis of the verse as well as the linguistic and metalinguistic level of the Quranic discourse, are of outmost significance. This study, using content analysis method and selecting a verse from Verses of the Rules (Ayāt al-ahkām), examines the effect of different syntactic analyses on the jurisprudence interpretation and the effect of jurisprudential assumptions in choosing the declension of the verse. Accordingly, the study seeks to answer the following question: what type of discourse system the Quranic discourse of Wasiyat relies on? Since the employment of the textual features is one of the important components of discourse analysis, there are several identificatory elements in the Quranic discourse analysis of the verse Wasiyat, namely, meanings of the words and expressions, declension and disagreement in syntactic rules, the principles and assumptions, and the impact of the jurisprudential ideas and thoughts. Although the disagreement in syntactic rules affects its jurisprudential judgment, it should be noted that since the disagreement in syntactic analysis is due to the difference in understanding the declension of the texts, various assumptions such as jurisprudential, verbal and so on, have a crucial role in choosing the declension of the verse. Consequently, the syntactic form of the verse Wasiyat implies a closed syntactic discourse which is based on a change from motivational to epistemic state. This involves elements such as different declensions which prepare the ground for jurisprudential judgment in the scope of necessity and religious preference. From the perspective of the believers to the necessity of Wasiyat (testamentary wills), there is a syntactic relationship governing the discourse system of the verse. Therefore, the governing discourse system of the verse is an intelligent and schematic one. From the perspective of religious preference, the interpretation of the phrase, " ÍóÞøðÇ Úóáóی ÇáúãõÊøóÞیä" and the word "ÈÇáãÚÑæÝ", as a sentimental and emotional state, can lead to the perception of meaning and action. Therefore, the Quranic discourse of the Wasiyat, so far as the religious preference is concerned, is based on the affective discourse system, and thus an emotional- tensive type.

This paper was written on the structure of Inflection Phrase (IP)in Persian. In the Framework of X’ – Theory. IP is the unit of syntax analysis of language. In other words, every sentence is an IP. In Persian TP, MP, AspP and VP are the complements of I, T, Mood and Asp. During the inflection process, the head V cyclicly moves to the above mentioned head to accept the national content of aspect, modality, tense and subject agreement. The markers stand for these notional categories are of auxiliaries, affixes or clitics. In Persian, the only auxiliary verb is “budan” (in three forms: “ast”, “bud” and “bash”) which is appeared in the node of inflection. The other inflectional markers are tense, mode and subject agreement markers. Finally, we have analysed Persian inflection phrase on the basis of x-bar theory.Consequently, some key points and hints are proposed on Persian future tense, continuous aspect and passive voice

To what extent are languages structurally different, and where do they follow universal patterns? Linguistic typological research systematically exploits descriptions of particular languages to answer questions like this. In turn, researchers working on individual language descriptions benefit from the extensive knowledge of linguistic structure that exists in the typological literature—Persian, for instance, is mainly operator, i.e., itsstructural specifications are as follows: NA (noun before genitive), NRel (head noun before relative clause), NG (noun before genitive), and comparative adjective before basis of comparison; furthermore, it is prepositional rather than postpositional. Similarities amonglanguages may be attributed to different factors: accident, historical changes, geographical neighborhood, and genetic affiliation. Language universality can well be regarded as a main factor too.Research in language typology goes hand in hand with research inlanguage universals, because the subject of both studies is thediversity of languages in connection with the linguistic properties.In the present paper, we are going to discuss some typologicalaspects of 'Middle Persian of Pahlavi. To begin with, we shall referto review some theoretical points about diachronic typology. Thenwe shall point to the possible analysis of the data for the benefit oflinguistic typology.