جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « ملک » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

The present study aims at reviewing the strategies employed in some Iranian linguistic varieties in order to express possession. To do so, first the type of possessive strategy used in each variety was described based upon the categorization made by Croft (2003). Then the features considered by Croft (1990) to analyze the possessive constructions and the variables like the order of possessor and possessum, the category of possessor (noun or pronoun), the importance of animate or inanimate being in expressing the relation of possessive, the presence or absence of discrimination in alienable or inalienable possession in each variety have been addressed. The findings show that in the varieties studied in this research, mostly only one strategy from the three forms of case marking, juxtaposition, and linker is used; but in some cases two strategies from the three are used to show possessive as a syntactic phrase. Case marking strategy dates back to Ancient Iranian languages while juxtaposition and linker ones reach to Middle West Iranian languages. In terms of the features characterized by Croft, the possessor and the possessum are adjacent without any fusion except for some varieties that use the clitic possessors. The additional morpheme in such varieties mostly follows the first constituent and rarely the second in affix (or clitic) form.

Ideology and vision of a religious and committed poet to the internal and external world is based on the definition of religion from the man’s nature, existence, its beginning and end. This ideology specifies the general orientation and approach of the religious and engaged literature. This article investigates representations of different aspects of commitment from religious perspective. For doing so, the relationship between commitment and influential elements in poetry such as imagination, beauty, affection, content, inspiration, faith and levels of the world (visible realm and invisible realm) have been studied. The results show that prioritizing faith and good deed, belief in good and ominous inspiration in poetry, playing the role of reflection by the high world and mediating between the visible realm and the invisible realm and concurrent authenticity of the content and aspects of the beauty of poetry-according to their function- constitute the main elements of the religious engaged literature.

Stories have lots of capacity to explain wisdom anddidacticissues. Prophets’stories such as holly Soleyman especially have this capacity. The word wisdom in Soleymaon story may be considered in many ways 1-the wordHikmat thatisdirectly related to Soleyman, in the book of Torah Society as well as philosophers,who says wise speeches. The book Soleyman’s proverb also contains these speeches. In addition, in holly Quranthere is specialized science which God has given to Solomonand he is verythankful to God and considered it as a merit.2-Proverbs derived from Solomon story which is the simplest type of Hikmat. 3- Wisdom, didactic and advices points in the story which surely has lots of details. Most significant parts of Soleymanregarding didactic onesareSoleyman, wind and Ant adventure.Soleyman’s life from succession andheredity from David until his death is full of wisdom and Hikmat which in this paper has been explained and analyzed.

In this research, by providing different morpho-syntactic strategies which are used by the speakers of the world's languages to make genitive constructions and determining the grammatical criteria which are considered in this classification, we are going to study the genitive strategies which are used in the contemporary Persian and analyze these strategies according to the mentioned criteria. Then, based on the criteria which determine the dominant strategy, we will specify the dominant strategy for making the genitive constructions in Persian and finally we will determine the linguistic type of the Persian language regarding the dominant strategy which is used by this language for making its genitive constructions. According to the studies done in this research, from two morpho-syntactic strategies, that is affixation and linker, the later strategy, which is called "the more grammaticalized strategy" by Croft (2003), is the dominant strategy in the contemporary Persian. Regarding the dependency criteria, this language is among the languages which are some where in between the concatenational and fused languages and considering the word order of the main constituents of the genitive construction, that is possessor and possessum, Persian belongs to the linguistic type which has the possessum-possessor word order in its genitive construction.

Title is a kind of proper name indicating praise or revilement. It thus, functions like a noun in introducing semantic properties about people, occupations, etc. Its usage is as old as that of the name. According to Nakhjavani the entitlement has been a part and parcel of the Persian dynasties’ rite and was not common among the Arabs. Historically speaking, One can see that the official titles bestowed upon people are more or less compounds i.e, they are formed by using words such as “Din”(religion), “dowlat”(state), “molk” (kingdom), “Saltanat” (monarchy), “Mellat” (nation), etc. The entitlement has lost its dignity and proper status through the passage of time. In Ghajar period, for example, the entitlement had simply a commercial function. The following article aims at a historico-structural analysis of titles.