جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « هماهنگی ممیزه گردی » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of five approaches of Optimality theory, including the following subsections "Feature alignment", "Feature linking with span", "Local agreement", "Span theory" and " Agreement-by-correspondence (ABC)" in analyzing the phenomenon of rounding harmony within Iranian (Razan and Tabriz) varieties of Turkish, as well as examining the difference in language class in the presence of a typological variety, and finally evaluating the effectiveness of each approach in the event of differences. The results indicated that with the exception of Local agreement and Feature alignment approaches, the other three approaches were very effective in explaining the phenomenon of rounding harmony between the two varieties under consideration, and the ability to explain the phenomenon of rounding harmony had the same inclusion in all three approaches. Moreover, despite the similarity of both varieties in the fields of syntax, morphology, etc., they were different in terms of typology; it means that each of them was categorized in a separate hypothetical language class A, B; which can be well proved in optimality analytical tableaux. The results indicated that in addition to the two approaches introduced by Sasa (2009), the Span theory was also quite successful in explaining the phenomenon of rounding harmony. This confirmed the innovation of the present study.

The present research is focused on the assessment of the efficiency of Optimality theory within Iranian (Razan and Tabriz) and Istanbul varieties of Turkish. The main research questions are as followed: 1. How much can the Optimality theory be effective in exploring the Turkish varieties? 2. Are there any typological differences in categorizing the varieties under consideration? If yes, how are they? The research results demonstrate that The Optimality theory in exploring rounding harmony in the varieties under consideration is very effective. For instance, it can realize the optimal form among the similar forms which are used in them by substituting restrictions. Despite the similarities observed within the syntactic, morphological, and other areas of the three varieties, within their typological area differences are detected, according to which the three systems can be classified in triple hypothetical categories of A, B, and C which can be proved within the tableaux of Optimality analysis.