جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "پژوهشی" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

The present study was an attempt to compare the types and frequencies of the Metadiscourse Markers (MMs) used in research articles published in international and Iranian local journals across the sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics. In so doing, 512 RAs totaling 3,051,168 words, selected from sixteen international and Iranian local journals across the sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics were compared and contrasted regarding the use of MMs applying the Frequency Program (Nation & Heatley, 2007). The study drew upon Hyland's (2005) model of MMs. The findings of the study demonstrated some similar and distinct trends in the way the two corpora employed MMs. It is suggested that the observed differences call for raising Iranian local RA writers’ awareness of the principles regarding the conventional application of MMs.

In recent years, more than twenty scientific articles in Persian journals published on the stream of consciousness narrative mode. But some of these articles have little knowledge about the theoretical aspects of this mode of narrative, and the author has written article without an adequate command of the subject. This paper has been reviewed 18 scientific articles and studied their Errors. Some of these errors are: Misperception of the unconscious concept and its place in the internal monologue narrative, considering dramatic monologue as a stream of consciousness narrative style, confusing internal monologue with other first person narrative, and misunderstanding of the concept of Soliloquy. One of the causes of these problems is that the author does not refer to reliable sources. Referee process of some journals is such that these articles are evaluated and released without debugging and the referral of others to the papers, will publish the next false.

Publishing research articles in contemporary period is an appropriate chance to share research findings of different scholars and informing audiences about new scientific achievements. Although their publishing have been quantitatively increasing in recent decade, there were no due attention to their assessment and criticism. This article, with a descriptive-analytic method, assesses those kinds of research articles published from 1381/2001 to 1390/2011. The research expresses advantages and disadvantages of these articles and presents a picture of the status of scientific article writing in domain of literary studies. In so doing, 345 articles were selected as examples and most important subjects under focus of authors were identified and were classified in frame of text-based, context-based, author-based, reader-based, and different articles. Moreover, patterns of cooperation between authors, and quality and quantity of used resources in these articles were presented in different charts and tables. As this issue is so important and to assess the accuracy of obtained results from main sample size, another set of 345 articles were exactly reviewed in two groups of “evidence 1” and “evidence 2”. This review shows that although articles have various subjects, apply different kinds of resources, consider some interdisciplinary approaches particularly in second half of this decade relative accuracy in composing coherent articles, specialty of some journals related to literature and considerable increase of university instructors and students cooperation in publishing articles, there are lots of deficiencies in these articles, like methodology, dominance of descriptive approach, repeated contents, lack of critical view, high frequency of education-based articles, and spread of quantitative and formal criteria and so on…

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of research articles of a scientific center elevates its status not only in generating education of a country rather it is effective optimum planning and policymaking with respect to science and research. With a review of qualitative and quantitative weakness and strength, the present paper distinguishes the place of this domain in the scientific output of Iran. This is a descriptive analytical study and was analyzed with SPSS. Here, 10 scientific journals, published between 2003 and 2007 were considered and 314 out of 1312 articles were extracted in Arabic language. The result shows that the proportion of articles related to this branch is 23/93% and this percent varied between different journals 5/5% & 100%. In This study, a journal of Faculty of Humanities of the University of Tehran with 71 articles had highest ratio and journal of Faculty of Humanities of the University of Tabriz has the least ratio. Collective cooperation between author shows that they inclined towards one and two persons. But collective cooperation had a rising trend from 2003 to 2007.