جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « acceptance » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

The process of actor representation in narrative involves various aspects of discourse-based formulations. The narrator refers to the actors as subjects to either accept or reject them, encompassing different stances, including acceptance and rejection with their sub-categories. Siavash Kasraei's stance as a subject-narrator towards a character as a subject-situator requires the selection of a specific approach and the rejection of other procedures. The mention or omission of actors in Arash Kamangir's poetry is directly related to the poet's thinking and his evaluation and interpretation of that character. The poet describes and depicts the situation of the character through his own interpretations.

Masnavi is full of psychological concepts that indicate Rumi’s careful and continuous thoughts, as well as his consideration of the different dimensions of the human spirit. The present research studied Masnavi from the perspective of the first principle of the psychological approach of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) through an analytical-comparative method. Rumi and the ACT theoreticians both believe that facing life suffering is inevitable for mankind and it must be thus accepted. In this way, humans can move towards spiritual and psychological developments. Both views use allegory to convince the audience. Rumi uses such concepts as destiny and naturalness of suffering in life to prepare the audience for acceptance. In this research, the two concepts of repentance in Islamic thought and acceptance in the ACT approach were comparatively studied. The difference in these two views stems in their ultimate goals. The main goal of ACT is to provide a satisfying material life and individual growth, but Rumi’s mystical view, which has been focused on pleasing God and reaching an eternal life in the other world, is more general. However, both views move in the same direction and pay attention to the human spirit, growth, and excellence. Considering the religious and mystical backgrounds of Iranian people, the ACT psychotherapists in Iran can well benefit from Masnavi as a Persian literary heritage.

The translation of "Ambiguity", especially in the Holy Quran, is one of the most challenging topic in linguistics. A variety of techniques have been proposed to eliminate it, including the Garces technique. This model using Newmarkchr('39')s views, examines "the amount of positive and negative attributes that indicate adequacy and acceptability of the T.T". The study with a counter-analytical approach, examined translations of Mojtabavi and Saffarzadeh from the part 30 of the Qurchr('39')an to improve the quality of translated text, especially in the challenges of linguistic ambiguity, based on a scientific theory and model. And based on statistics, the quantities of these techniques have been compared. And the adequacy and acceptability of each translation is outlined in the first six Surah. The result showed that according to Garcés model, Mojtabachr('39')s translation with ambiguous and virtual words has a higher adequacy and acceptance than Saffarzadeh. Saffarzadeh, with unambiguous text, has undergone creative and complex additions to transparency; Especially in virtual vocabulary. On the other hand, in cases that need to be "explained", such as Qurchr('39')anic allusions, Mojtabavichr('39')s translation is less adequacy and acceptable than Saffarzadeh. Generally, Mojtabavi techniques have a higher level of adequacy and acceptability in disambiguation.

As Saussure says, the meaning of the unites is not in the meaning itself, but the meaning is essentially an aspect of differentiation. In this perspective, all values are attributed to the “relationship”, not to individual units or separately of words what happens accordingly for a subject (“I” or “we") and its identity: the subject defines itself by the “difference", and in order to achieve the specified identity, it needs to other one. So Landowski suggests a general pattern that consists of four different strategies about the relationship between "I" as dominant and "other"as dominated. This pattern originates from semiotics square of Greimas. These strategies include assimilation, exclusion, segregation and identity acceptance. The main objective of this paper is to show that this pattern can be used in translation’s domain that is a challenging atmosphere of contact between our language and other foreign language. But the main question is that how Landowski identity pattern can be used basically for a new reading of the translation strategies.

Jalalod-din Mohammad Balhki is considered to be one of the greatest poets and thinkers in the world. The best mystical and ethical concepts have been treated in his Mathnavi-e-Manavi. Ethics is the introduction of mystical behaviour, and this book consists of ethical subjects. Mowlavi has used the method of telling story in this book, so we can see that the told ethical concepts have survived. Mowlavi has presented a new reading of ethical withhold too. On the other hand, William James who is known as an activist philosopher as well as a realist psychologist, has treated the subject of ethical withhold in his works. The present article studies these two persons' point of view on the same subject.

This study aims to examine the most important non-linguistic factors influencing the acceptance of neologisms approved by Academy of Persian Language and Literature، called Farhangestan، among Persian speakers in Iran. The theoretical basis used for this research was the diffusion of innovation model devised by Robert Leon Cooper. To get the goal، the criterion variables of adoption in the speech community were evaluated by questionnaire in three provinces. The different descriptive and inference statistics were used to determine the correlation between the mentioned variables: awareness، evaluation، knowledge and usage، in relationship to each other and to background ones: age، sex and education. The main results gained in this study show that there is a positive significant correlation between the awareness and knowledge and between evaluation and usage as well along with some other subordinate results. Above all، We came to this conclusion that Farhangestan، as the greatest language planner in Iran، can influence the awareness variable so that the proficiency and knowledge of using their neologisms by the potential adopters can be monitored. On the other hand، it can put effect on evaluation to promote frequent usage of neologisms. All these lead to diffusing the linguistic innovations، that is، the approved neologisms.