جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « authentic » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

Malfuzat is said to the texts that are the result of writing and collecting the words of sheikhs in sufi meetings of India. After the writing of “Fawaid al-Fuad” Amir Hassan Sijzi, which is the most impressive example of this literary genre, in the early 8th century, some works called Malfuzat appeared, which were related to the early sheikhs of Chishti and at least a century ago.There have always been debates about the authenticity and attribution of these works to their author. This article compares two works of “Malfuzat” by Chishti Order; Khair al-Majalis, the compilations of sheikh Nasiruddin Mahmood chirag dehlavi, is reliable in terms of authenticity, and the other is anis Al-Arwah, the compilations of sheikh Usman Harooni, which became popular a century after it was written.this article, by reviewing these two works more closely and examining the structural and content characteristics, gives reasons that reveal the imputation and inauthenticity of anis al-arwah compared to other text. The most important of these reasons are the absence of the presence of the author, the existence of historical ambiguity in the work, the attribution of the writing of the text to the main caliph sheikh, the existence of some characteristics of written texts, and the low frequency of verbal character in attributed and fake text.

Today, the significance of literary Tazkerehs, especially those which are original and old and have extraliterary advantages, is obvious and irrefutable. Nafayes al- Ma’aser is the oldest Persian literary Tazkereh written about the era of Timurids of India. Thus, it includes very authentic information about the poets of such era in Iran and India as well as history of India in Akbar Shah period. Also, there is valuable poetic evidence in this book adding to other values of such work. Kami Qazvini, the author of this book, was from the outstanding and knowledgeable family of Sadat Hassani of Qazvin who immigrated to India due to religious pressures and became one of the men of letters in Akbar Shah’s court. His work was neglected by his contemporaries, strangely to the extent that it was unknown to many Tazkereh writers after him. Of course, there were a few people who used this work covertly or overtly but did not value him and his work as much as they deserved. This article aims to introduce this work and its prominent features as well as to analyze its sources and information and the writers who were influenced by him.