جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "balochi" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

 Balochi and Farsi are branches of the family of Iranian languages ​​that have been in the Iranian plateau and in the neighborhood with each other and interacted with each other throughout history. One of the functions of comparative literature is to investigate the effectiveness and influence between the literature of different languages. Considering the cultural predominance of Persian language and literature in Iran and its widespread influence among Muslim nations, its effects on Balochi literature and poetry are obvious and significant.. The influence of Balochi poets on Persian reached its peak in the second period of Balochi literature and the school of Mullahs. Mawlavi Abdollah Rawanbod is one of the famous Balochi poets and the last generation of poets of this school. He is a bilingual poet whose Balochi poems are influenced by Persian language and literature. This article has analyzed the Rawnbod’s balochi poems with a descriptive-analytical method and has shown this aspect in his Balochi poems. Rawanbod's poems are not uniform in terms of the influence of Persian language and literature. Even though his poems are strongly influenced by Persian poets like Saadi in terms of theme and fantasy elements, but in terms of language, they are fluent and original. And sometimes he is so influenced by Persian in writing Balochi poetry that the stanzas become Persian with a slight change or adjustment of a word, and even some of them can be considered completely Persian.

Sarawani Balochi is one of the dialects of the Balochi language. The aim of this paper is to study and describe some of the historical phonological changes from Old Iranian in this dialect and comparing them with Persian. Moreover, the syllable structure in Sarawani Balochi will be compared with Old, Middle and New Persian. To achieve this goal, phonemes were gathered from the speech of Sarawani Balochi speakers and some phonological changes were compared diachronically. Findings show that, for example that the Old Iranian diphthongs have remained in Sarawani Balochi. Also, the preservation of the phoneme /t/ at the end of words is another feature of this dialect. The comparison of syllable structure in Sarawani with Old, Middle and New Persian shows that the (c)cv(c)(c) structure is more similar to Middle Persian than New Persian.

Known exclusively from historical documents of the 14th-15th centuries, Gorgāni is largely overlooked in Iranian dialectology. This paper is organized in three parts: (I) grammar, (II) typology, (III) diachrony. The right-branching noun phrase places Gorgāni within the Caspian-Alborz Sprachbund. Such continuum does not hold in other typological features when Gorgāni is compared areally with Caspian and Komisenian. Morphological idiosyncrasies include: possessor with oblique marker -n; imperfective with hī-; future with kām-; irrealis with -nd-; 3sg pronoun . These characteristics substantiate that Gorgāni belongs to none of the recognized West Iranic language groups. Gorgāni shows exclusive isoglosses with its historical neighbor Balochi. Genealogically, Gorgāni displays a strong Northwest Iranian pedigree, as expected of a language that could once be in contact with Parthian.

The past stem with its varied forms in different dialects of Balochi, like other Iranian languages which are inflected languages, has special value in morphology, grammar, and standardization etc. In this article the authors describe the morphological structures of past stems in Balochi using a diachronic-synchronic method. The basic sources for gathering data are the collection of 201 simple verbs of Bampuri dialect which is a western dialect of Baluchi. The verbs are arranged according to the morphemes used for representing past stems. The findings show that past stem in the Bampuri dialect of Balochi, with its varied uses, is represented in ten distinguished forms. Among them, five are regular and five others irregular. In addition, the structural differences are due to the four following factors: 1- historical remnants from Iranian languages, 2- morphological contexts, 3-dialectical differences, 4- analogy with other verbs.