جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « ethos » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

Influenced by the interpretive attitudes of the Middle Ages and committed to the teachings of New Criticism, Frye, drawing on structuralist methodology, developed innovative ideas for analyzing the structure of a literary work. In his literary poetics, he assumes that the meaning of a literary work consists of elements and components that can be determined by focusing on mode, symbol, archetype, and genre. In such a framework, he considers the components of ethos, mythos, and dianoia as the basic elements that make up meaning. Meanwhile, however, it seems that Ethos has not been adequately addressed. In this essay, we first attempt to answer why ethos seems to be neglected in his ethical critique, which is necessarily based on ethos, through an analysis of the theoretical implications and consequences of what Frye holds. In what follows, along with the methodological explanation of Frye's analysis, we attempt to show how the seemingly neglected ethos reappears in Frye's theoretical framework. In the end, it turns out that ethos is part of Frye's theoretical framework not because of methodological considerations, but because of teleological considerations.

The personal credibility and authority of the historian are one of the major subjects in Historiography. It's important since the greater the personal credit of historians, the greater would be the degree of persuasion of the audience. In this article, we analyze the degree of historian influence on audience persuasion and rhetorical methods and verbal devices used for historiography credit which makes the text more believable to the audience. In this article, applying the Neo- Aristotelian criticism method, we want to demonstrate the historian Ethos and strategies used by him to increase his credit. For this purpose, we choose Futuḥāt-i shāhī Cornicle by Amīnī Haravī, since it was one of the first and impressive histories of Safavi's government formation and its ideology because the role and personal credibility of historian and his persuasive of methods are very important.

The Relationship between locutor and interlocutor has always been an interesting subject for philosophers and critics. In Rhetoric, Aristotle expresses that the author can affect reader by three ethos, pathos and logos. Between them, we concentrate on ethos that is so important in new criticism and represents the presence of author in text or discourse. This presence is not limited to the text as an enunciator. Specifically, it should be studied in discourse where the author essays to consider the writing and the way of writing in order to justify his artistic identity. This type of identity quest is noticeable in Indian style poets’ works. The Indian style poet, who wants to show a perfect image of himself and his art of writing poems, tries to keep his ethos. They attempt to create an acceptable image of themselves through self-theorization, self-expression, self-exception and self-comparison.