جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « unity in plurality » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

Binary oppositions have long captivated mystics and are a focal point for structuralists, who often build the foundation of texts around them. By emphasizing these dichotomies, they aim to unveil a unified system and gain deeper insights into the text. In "Mouton Sageer" (A Small Death), binary oppositions play a central role, and this study examines their significance in the story of Hassan Alwan through a descriptive-analytical approach. Drawing from Ibn Arabi's mystical themes, the research delves into the perspectives of Iranian mystics to elucidate the author's underlying framework. The title "A Small Death" symbolizes an earthly love that undergoes a transformation, elevating a mortal being to a celestial realm and fostering a connection to true love. Alvan's work strives to expound upon an intellectual system rooted in binary oppositions, illustrating a mystical concept of "unity in plurality" where love serves as the unifying principle. The ultimate goal is to bring harmony to the current world, transcending conflict, as Alvan posits love as the key element that binds individuals together.

The idea of the unity of existence in the history of Islamic mysticism is linked to the name of Ibn Arabi, and the influence of this idea is such that it can be claimed that there is no writing or poem about mysticism after Ibn Arabi that has not represented this idea in any way. The discussion of unity and plurality, which is one of the most important issues related to the idea of unity of existence and the concept of manifestation, has been due to its contradictory nature to explain and Enlightenment many allegories in the works of Ibn Arabi and his commentators. In this research, which has been done by descriptive-analytical method, the types of these allegories in the poems of Shams Maghribi, who is one of the most famous poets of existential unity in Persian poetry, have been studied and analyzed. Considering the remarkable influence of Shams al-Maghribi on Ibn Arabi and his works, it became clear that most of the allegories he used about unity and plurality are rooted in Ibn Arabi's own works, and he made the fewest poetic acquisitions in these allegories because of the way he used them. Ibn Arabi has been very careful about these allegories, and any intrusion and occupation by the Maghrebi could have distorted the concepts.

Unity and plurality are important philosophical issues that have impact on other philosophical rules. Unity and plurality link profoundly with existence And quiddity. Unity is coextensive with existence. Most of philosophers including Mulla sadra classify existence and Unity among secondary intelligibles and quiddity among primary intelligibles. Considering that primary intelligible has referent in external world and the understanding of the secondary intelligibles based on primary intelligible, It must be said the result of the belief of Mulla sadra is that we form and constitute existence concept based on quiddity and And this point is incompatible with other rules of transcendent philosophy. By criticizing the famous philosophers' view, this paper thinks that existence and quiddity are primary intelligibles and quiddity and plurality are secondary intelligibles. By criticizing the famous philosophers' view, this paper thinks that existence and quiddity are primary intelligibles and quiddity and plurality are secondary intelligibles.

mystical literature Has a special place, Masnavi is like a miracle.Rumi's beautiful expression and use of allegory with various tips in the form of similes, metaphors, allusions, ancient and patterns ... to express Mystical object. Sports themes such as destruction, annihilation in Allah's attributes, Unity is a form of reasoning concepts with different purposes, To the mind of the decisions about what, in a decision about something else, because of the similarity between it creates Dvmqvlh­ The garlic. He believes that this property is Vjsmany material forms and templates, Which prevents see the truth because behind them nothing but unity does not exist. The only way to get to the truth except through Vastghraq on the right will not forget. Rumi, to prove the unity of spirits, of metaphorical allegories such as shades of light barrier Congress Nvrkh article speaks the truth. Inally, the Masnavi unity shops or anything other than God knows He knows apparent and unreal.

Muslim mystics have turned to political issues relying on both unity and plurality criteria. They have explained the characteristics of a mystic politician emphasizing the necessity of mysticism for politicians and even the necessity of politics for mystics. Taking a social viewpoint، the early Sufis، paid a particular attention to this important matter in their speech and behavior، and invited other Sufis to be bounteous and to get a fair and compassionate approach to their disciples. The Sufis who lived in the reign of oppressive Umayyad [1] and Abbasid caliphs tried to clarify the real face of Islamic ruler explaining the features of a mystic ruler and modeling the manner of holy prophets and the companions of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon Him). They have also had some political attitudes in their works which can be discussed independently. Considering the primary sources and trying to establish a close association to the main origins، in present essay، we have determined the range of the research up to the 4th Hijri century with a glance on the works and speeches of some mystics such as Hasan Basri، Sofyan Suri، Fozeil Ayāz، Hārith Mohāsebi، Zonnun Mesri، Yahyā bin Maʻāz، Abu-Hātam Rāzi، Bāyazid Bastāmi، Sahl Tostari، Abu-Saeed Kharrāz، Termazi، Joneid، Shebli، Kolābāzi، Sarraj، Makki، Khargushi and Solami.