جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « verb stem » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

The dialect of Tonekaboni differs from the dialects of the speakers in the East of Mazandaran and the West of Guilan where the native speakers of the three regions use Persian to communicate. During the implementation of a part of a research project and in order to find the reason for the lack of mutual understanding between the speakers of the east and west of Mazandaran and the difference between their dialects which both are taken into account as Mazandarani (Tabari) language, the author has concluded that the most important factor is the difference between the construction of their verbs due to the unusual stem in Tonekaboni verbs. The aim of this paper is to describe the verb stem and analyze its different structure in Tonekaboni dialect. In this research, a fieldwork for data gathering was applied through a targeted interview with 10 native speakers to obtain the different paradigms of verbs. The current study showed that verbs stems in this dialect were based on "aspect", while in most languages, like Iranian language family, the stems of verb are based on its tense (commonly present and past), to which inflectional affixes – including aspect of the verb – are attached. This study on one hand, introduces the distinctive feature of aspect -based stems in Tonekaboni, the most widely-used dialect of one of the Caspian language group, which is in decline; and on the other hand it may be useful for dialectology, typology and sociolinguistic studies.

The present paper explores the semantic contribution of some affixes and verb stems (past and present) in sorani, a majo dialect of Kurdish.In the lexical semantic representation framework, affixes, like other lexical items, have semantic features, subcategories, arguments and semantic skeletons. In this framework, lexical items, including affixes, are defined by the following semantic features: ‌[material],[dynamic], [Location], [IEPS], [B] and [CI] and semantic skeletons are represented for them. Then the skeletons are put together and the argument of the affix is co-indexed with one of the arguments of the base to make a semantic unit that refers to one element. Here are the conclusions gained based on the theory: the contribution of present stems of simple verbs to creating new lexemes is much more than the contribution of past stems; some affixes have the same semantic skeletons and as a result they make the same semantic contribution and their different representation in new lexemes is related to other factors; lastly, contrary to our expectation, there exist some affixes in Sorani that have two semantic skeletons.