جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Hadiqat » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

Today the expansion of researches and scientific deliberations in rich the heritage of Persian literature، provide an appropriate condition for comparative study in literary books. This research benefitting from Intertextuality and Transtextuality methods compares contents of two valuable books in theosophical Persian literature field: Hadiqat-o alhaqiqeh by Sanaei Qaznavi and Mersadolebad by Najm-e Razi. Transtextuality method was first introduced by Julia Kristeva (1960th) and then was developed by Gérard Genette. According to Gérard Genette transtextuality is «all that sets the text in relationship، whether obvious or concealed، with other texts» and it «covers all aspects of a particular text». Genette described transtextuality as a «more inclusive term» than intertextuality. In this research، we find such documentary results through comparison “beginning style”، “classification type”، “explicit & indirect quotation”، “introduction”، “Theme & content”، “interaction to Sufism”، “interpretation and criticism of each other” and “inspiring each other” in mentioned books.

Hakīm Sanāßī-ye Ġaznavī is one of distinguished poets of the 6th c. A. H. whose works have been imitated by his successors. Frequent reproduction of his works, his peculiar vocabulary and difficulty in understanding the meaning of some of the words used by him are among the factors that have resulted in misinterpretation of his work and distortion. Hadīqat-ol-Haqīqa va Šarīcat-ol-Tarīqa is the first mystic Mathnavi and is the production of the creative mind of this outstanding poet. In this work, like his other works, there are some errors. Ancillary sources like old sources containing parts of the relevant text may pave the way for editing. This article uses Farhang-e Jahāngīrī, as one of the major old references, to study and criticize a number of the couplets of Hadighe Sanāßi.