جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "اصل حاکمیت" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

Maintaining sovereignty and borders is a norm and value for most countries, and governments, considering the conspiracies and conspiracies of other countries, take any measures to protect the security of the country and the privacy and security of their citizens. But today, due to the advancement of technology in the field of military weapons, some countries intend to use drones for espionage and reporting purposes, and for military purposes in general, by violating international laws and customs and entering the country illegally. The soil of other countries leads to the shattering and undermining of international security and stability. This action will lead the aggressor country to protest and retaliate and, if necessary, to defend itself legitimately by a third government. Violation of the privacy of any country is condemned in any way and under any circumstances, and this encroachment on the aggressed country creates legitimate rights such as formal warning and protest, summoning the ambassador of the hostile government, destruction or looting of weapons, claiming damages, legitimate defense. And use military action, complaints to the Security Council, and prosecution in international courts to realize their lost rights in the international community.

Nowadays, with the advent of technological developments and different communications methods, there is no need to direct methods of coercion, repression and suppression anymore. Over the years, after the years of transition from classical methods of exercising power and loss of legitimacy of direct exercising power, governments tried to adopt different and efficient strategies. This efficiency also depends on the amounts of the expected achievements. The current strategy of governments is based on soft power and using this form of power has a greater range. Sometimes this power takes extra-territorial form and international relations.This study seeks to find an answer to the question how could Russia incorporate Crimean Peninsula to Russian Federation without the slightest conflict? How much Russia’s new military doctrine has been effective? The method of present research is library research and uses original sources about soft power and Russian military doctrine by which the analysis of the events surrounding the incorporation of Crimean to Russia’s territory becomes possible. The necessity and importance of this research originate from the fact that stability of governments is based on the concept of “border” and modern tools in the field of soft power can threaten global security and order. Results of this study show that according to the UN charter and existing procedures, any direct or indirect intervention of states in internal affairs of other states is strongly prohibited. Instruments of soft power which intervene the internal affairs of countries are also the examples of these prohibited tools because the absolute sovereignty of governments on citizens in internal dimension and freedom of action in external relations is the exclusive right of governments.

Globalization as a process that highly affects human interactions and relationship and have attracted special attention among people’s public opinion, governments and international organizations, in a way that the role and place of human being and the rights that he is entitled to, have become very important; such that we are witnessing the globalization of human rights has become jus cogens. On this basis globalization of human rights has led to adjustment of the principle of sovereignty and non-interference. As a result the grounds have been prepared for military intervention in the internal affairs of the countries on the pretext of humanitarian intervention and the responsibility about the breach of individual human rights. In this regard it becomes necessary to evaluate the level of desirability and legitimacy of humanitarian intervention in Syria taking into consideration the crisis in this country and the ensuing events that are considered as violation of human rights. An understanding which shows the real truth behind the intervention in Syria and violation of her sovereignty under the pretext of humanitarian intervention is not under the impact of global developments of human rights and the globalization process which supports human rights and object the breach of them but it is all done with political motives and the justification behind it is the violation of human rights.

Technology and the development of the communications tools, in spite of their advantages and benefits, have caused numerous concerns for countries all over the world; this necessitates adopting a legal attitude and imposing limitations on its employment. While in the past countries only regarded the application of weapons and military force as aggression, today cyber-war has caused great concern, and is regarded as a serious threat by all countries. One type of cyber-war, which has aroused grave concern and brought about widespread protest, is hostile propaganda. The present article specifically addresses the legal limitations of the measures of the media against the interests of other countries, generally referred to as hostile propaganda.