جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "حقوق ترکیه" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The foundations and principles governing criminal prosecution include structures and frameworks that explain what prosecution is and why it is justified. Undoubtedly, understanding the social and philosophical foundations of every human establishment is essential. Accordingly, the logical and social structures governing criminal prosecution are of special importance. The purpose of this investigation is to find out what and why criminal prosecution is based on, and is designed based on its strength or weakness. This is because, on the one hand, in order to properly understand the criminal prosecution and its accurate evaluation, it is necessary that the principles, goals and principles governing it have been carefully examined. On the other hand, in order to get familiar with the process of prosecution, different methods of prosecution in Iranian and Turkish law, prosecution by the court (predominant method in Turkey) and prosecution by the prosecutor (the only method in Iran) have been examined.

The present study is a comparative study of cases, origin and effects of legal vacancies in the field of official document in Iran and Turkey. According to the subject documentation presented in this research, the research method is descriptive-analytical and the method of data collection in this article is libraries. The findings of this study indicate that, in a comparative comparison between the two countries, Iran and Turkey in the field of official documents in both countries, special attention has been paid to the official document. It has led to the qualifications and powers of the editors and the performance guarantees for official document envisaged in the laws to be taken into account. In addition, the official document faces many legal vacancies in both countries.