جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « قانون گرایی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

One of the most effective ways to achieve the desired foreign policy coordinates in the light of Islamic teachings is to refer to a set of views and opinions of influential elites who are familiar with the theoretical frameworks of Islamic politics and have valuable experience in practical politics. In view of this, the present article seeks to answer the question that "politics, while focusing on the field of foreign policy - as one of the most important areas influencing the maximum provision of national interests - from the perspective of Ayatollah Mahdavi Kani. "From the perspective of Ayatollah Mahdavi Kani, the desirable foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Iran is drawn on the basis of what principles."

‌ In order to answer the written question, the method of thematic content analysis and reference to library resources has been used.

After extracting the related concepts, the principles of foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran were categorized from his point of view and it was found that he divided these principles under the three axes of "justice and oppression", "protection of the oppressed" and "priority of legalism and peace". »Explained.

Finally, the fruits of research show that Ayatollah Mahdavi Kani (RA) in the field of politics, especially foreign policy, with a virtuous approach and realism-oriented idealism looks at this field and the above three principles, respectively, the most importance in his political thought. Has had.

Following the victory of the Islamic Revolution and the establishment of the Islamic Republic, the Iranian legal system underwent a profound and fundamental change in the principles, rules and legal requirements, and the amendment of laws based on the revelatory principles of Islam became the head of the country's legislative policy. After about forty years of the life of the Islamic Revolution, the question arises that what are the characteristics of the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran and what is its position in comparison with other legal systems? Findings of this research using descriptive-documentary research method, show that the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, while combining the legal system and the adoption of new laws with moral teachings and Islamic values, is manifested as a comprehensive and transcendent model in Interaction with global approaches has taken a new approach. Western legal systems, based on the two broad orientations of "natural law" and "positivist school", limit the constituents of law to rational cognitions, pure justice, political and economic ends, public will and empiricism, and therefore They have suffered from reductionism and inadequacy. The legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, having the strengths of other legal systems and eliminating the shortcomings of these systems, has become a sublime and complete model that, while paying attention to social goals and material goals, based on religious principles and divine and spiritual values. Consistent. Therefore, the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran in comparison with global paradigms can be considered a new, comprehensive and transcendent model.

The utmost effort was made by Iranians for presenting a modern discourse in the constitutional age. Although minutes and elements of such discourse (containment of monarch’s power, freedom and law) not only failed to become hegemonic in Iran’s community, but also one self-willed and oligarchic government called government of Reza Shah emerged from within such discourse and turned dream of legalism of Iranians that was focus of constitutional discourse into a horrible nightmare in the despotic rule night of Reza Shah. This article deals with a study of how constitutional meta-discourse and its effective factors are formed. It is also shown that how subjective pre-structures of the forces affecting the constitutional movement embark on creating foreign identities and so new identity borders are forged within the movement; the central symbol of this movement changes from rule of law to modernization and security. Besides, it will be shown how otherness within social forces leads to zerosome political development and lack of meaningful change in political culture of community. Methodology applied in this article is discourse analysis of Laclau and Mouffe.

In the present article, it has been reflected on the indexes of Favorable and unfavorable Political system with the emphasis on the interpretations of Seyed Abolfazl Zanjani.
The tendency towards Consultation, freedom, awareness, justice, considering human’s rights, following rules and regulations, are considered the Favorable Political system in accordance with the Holy Quran while no possibility of criticism, superficiality, being inconsiderate towards the expense of public treasury, blind obedience, being suspicious towards the political cons, and making separation among nation are considered as the indicators of unfavorable Political system.
In this research, it has been utilized the method of intellectual history. In view of Zanjani, in the present community there exists the possibility of developing a Favorable Political system based on Holy Quran calibrated with the consultative content as well as the structure of political parliamentary system.

Viability is a fundamental concept in political thought which is currently beenig emphasized in political systems. This research is an effort to explain the issue of viability of IslamicRepublic of Irans political system in Imam Khomeinis viewpoint. Therefore, we study his attitudes and thoughts in this regard, mentioning the concept of viability and its indicesand mechanisms. We believe that since the formation of Islamic revolution and Imam Khomeinis thoughts are based on religious beliefs, viability and its indices and mechanismsare based on Islamic pattern as well; indices and solutions like the rule of law, democracy, meritocracy, expediency and unity which have been mentioned in this research.