جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « مرکز » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

I.R. of Iran as a regional actor has many historic-cultural capacities for cultural influence in the  South Caucasus region; so that this can be admission to benefit from the new tools of cultural diplomacy by I.R. of Iran in the region in order to achieving  its foreign policy goals. But The Existence of internal and external obstacles has been interrupted in this context and Caused that iran has to the Semi-periphery position in the cultural field in the Periphery region of South Caucasus on base Wallerstein Thoughts. The research question is: What are the reasons for weakness in I.R. of Iran's Cultural Diplomacy performance in the South Caucasus? The research hypothesis also is that Iran at the same faced with internal challenges, marginalized in the field of culture of region due to effective performance by other actors (external obstacle). The research method in this article is descriptive-analytical and content analysis with using library tools.

The relationship between Moscow and the peripheral republics of the Soviet Union has been a controversial issue. The complicatedness and implications of this relationship was to a degree recognized during the Soviet era. Yet it was after the Collapse of the Communist regime that its real scope and significance were revealed, especially in Central Asian and Caucasian republics where a variety of problems and crises emerged at local, national, and regional levels. The main argument of this article is that an analytical framework based on three core concepts of totalitarianism, modernization, and colonialism can not only help us analyze the core-periphery relations during the Communist era, but also deeply contributes to our understanding of the post-Soviet conditions in regions such as Central Asia. In the discussion on these three concepts, their ideological origins as well as their concrete implications are fully discussed.