جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « مشروعیت بخشی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Political systems always need the issue of legitimacy in order to establish a link between them and social systems. This important issue has paved the way for the emergence of various theories of legitimacy from the past to the present. The channels for the emergence of this legitimacy are sometimes based on religious and divine standards, sometimes on philosophical and social achievements, and sometimes on political views. The religious aspect of legitimacy in Shiite Islam shows that it has been the main factor in justifying and legitimizing the structure of the rule of the holy shari'a and the doctrine of revelation. However, due to the acute and serious circumstances of this matter and the vital importance of the issue of political community, the religion of Islam has taken the utmost caution and attention in the form of recommendations and the establishment of specific conditions. The concept of guardianship, which in addition to the source of the Qur'an and the Sunnah and narrations of the Imams, also has the necessary authority and sound argument in terms of obedience and intellect, shows the extent to which in the absence of the Infallible Imam Be. Accordingly, the preconditions for guardianship and jurisprudence are the same axis and focus that is seen in the term "Wali Faqih". It is on this basis that the Islamic system under the tutelage and leadership of such a person can have the necessary legitimacy and legitimacy in accordance with the standards of Shiite Islam.

The purpose of this study was the role of social participation and legitimation of emerging media in relation to the Iranian Football Premier League with a 360-degree approach. The method of field research is purpose-based development-applied. The statistical population included all football coaches, football managers, players, referees, journalists in football leagues and media communication experts, as well as the audience of the country's premier football league. The research sample consisted of 384 people (emphasizing the adequacy of the sample formula for determining the size of the cochlear sample).The sampling method in this study was stratified random. Data collection tools included a researcher-made questionnaire evaluating the performance of emerging media in relation to the Premier Football League, consisting of 2 components (social participation and legitimacy) and 15 items. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha. Data were analyzed using one-sample t-test. Based on the obtained results, social participation and legitimacy of emerging media in relation to the Iranian Football Premier League with a 360-degree approach was reported to be desirable (P = 0.0001).

Following the 9/11 attacks, the US, as a part of its "war on terrorism", attacked Afghanistan and Iraq to lead what was called a campaign to liberate all the people from terrorism and direct them towards freedom and democracy. In the years that followed, thousands of people were killed, injured, and lost their homes; thousands of people tried to find refuge in other countries; and incalculable losses were incurred. Terrorism, however, was not stopped and terrorist activities spread all over the world. This costly and damaging policy with all its negative consequences was made possible by legitimizing strategies of US administration. This article seeks to analyze the legitimizing discourse of the Bush administration through metaphor and predicate analysis. The findings show how American officials and in particular President Bush, by relying on hegemonic discourses such as liberalism and American exceptionalism, constructed a new representation of the self and the other through which US practices and policies could be justified.