جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "منابع هیدروکربنی" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

 The issue of Turkish-Israel relations is a significant topic in regional studies. Since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1949, bilateral relations between Turkey and Israel have witnessed substantial growth and development in various fields. As two powerful players in the Middle East and the Mediterranean, the developments in the Mediterranean region have a crucial impact on their future relations. This research aims to investigate how the developments in the Mediterranean Sea will affect the future of Turkish-Israeli relations. The research hypothesis suggests that although Ankara and Tel Aviv share common interests and threats in the Mediterranean, these factors may limit their cooperation in the future. To evaluate the impact of Mediterranean developments on their relationship, the study employs the explanatory capacities of regional security theory, which identifies the influencing components as the main factors of a security complex. Additionally, this research uses future studies to examine the connection between Turkish-Israeli relations and the developments in the Mediterranean Sea. The results indicate that based on their shared interests and threats, Turkey and Israel seek to establish cooperative relations.

The purpose of this research is to study the geopolitics of the Arctic as a new scene of geopolitical confrontation in the future and the beginning of a new alignment of powers to dominate new energy sources with emphasis on Russia's role in the region. This research has been done using descriptive and analytical methods and collection tools such as library and documents. The Arctic is increasingly at the center of disputes between the United States, Russia, Canada, Norway, and Denmark over its vast underground resources due to its vast oil and gas reserves. Increasing the temperature and decreasing the diameter of the ice becomes more accessible. The five countries, especially Russia, intend to expand their sphere of ownership in this region.But in the meantime, Russia, in addition to having the largest border with the pole and the largest volume of estimated resources in this region and the largest ice-cold fleet in the world due to the unique geographical position of the North Pole in terms of aristocracy over different regions of the country for each The type of possible military attack also has a strategic and strategic position, and based on this, it is possible that considering the geo-economic and geo-strategic position of this region, the North Pole can be a lever for the rise of this power (Russia).

Political legitimacy foundations are bases which any government or leader needs in local and international system. If any political transition goes on transition without legitimacy, that will be failed. Rationalization of accepting a government or leader’s sovereignty defined as legitimacy is the dominant concern of rulers and straightly related to the state’s power and the level of multitude’s freedom. Therefore, regime survival which directly linked by legitimacy is the main issue of post-soviet central Asia leaders. By Weber, the central Asia leaders’ legitimacy defined through charismatic and traditional legitimacy, while by soviet dissolution and entrance of central Asian states to the international system as new political independent units, they encounter the modern foundation of legitimacy, which undermined their current legitimacy. In this descriptive-analytical essay, we are trying to present a structural perspective on today’s central Asian legitimacy according to the modern foundations of legitimacy to use as an analytical template for subsequent political transition.