جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "ناپایداری" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The instability of voting behavior due to influencing the election process and results for political parties and groups and in the form of political participation in the country's macro-politics is an important issue that is influenced by various elements; Due to the position of culture in directing the behavior of cultural drivers, the instability of voter behavior needs to be studied. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of phenomenological analysis of cultural drivers of instability of voting behavior in the elections of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. The research method is descriptive phenomenology; the data collection tool was a semi-structured interview in a research sample of 20 candidates for parliamentary and election campaigns, which was done by collage method. The validity of the research data was confirmed through external auditors, return to interviewees, and in-depth description. The results showed that factors such as inciting ethnic emotions, Conformity, cognitive inequality and youth culture play a significant role in the instability of voting behavior in the Islamic Consultative Assembly elections.

At the beginning of the ninth and tenth Iranian governments, the country adopted an aggressive discourse against the international community and the interests of great powers of the world. During this period of time, the main goal of Iran’s foreign policy was changing the international system on the basis of  a justice-oriented approach. Realization of revolutionary ideals and changing the world`s management system was considered as the short -term objective of Iranian foreign policy. Thus, in the Principelist government, Iran`s foreign policy moved towards radicalism. In Iran's "Moderate" government, realization of revolutionary ideals is considered as the long term-aims. On the contrary, security and economic welfare became the short-term objectives of Iran’s foreign policy. Therefore, accepting the status quo relatively, practicing détente policy and renewing relationships with the great powers considered as the main priorities of the moderate government. The main question of this article is that: “How can this instability in the priorities of Iranian foreign policy be decribed?” The assumption of this research is that Iranian foreign policy approaches in the Principelist and moderate governments are affected by different domestic and international normative structures. On this basis, the impacts of domestic and international normative structures on shaping Iranian foreign policy in the both Principelist and Moderate governments have been investigated