جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "de-escalation" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

China's mediation between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which led to de-escalation of the relations between the two countries, is considered not only a turning point in Tehran-Riyadh relations, but also a turning point in the developments in the Middle East, as well as China's initiatives for world peace and security. The question of the article is what factors have been effective in China's success in de-escalating tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia? The hypothesis of the article, which has been examined in a descriptive and analytical way, is that the interweaving of interests between China and the Middle East region, especially the Persian Gulf, China's close relations with Tehran and Riyadh, and their perception of China's neutrality and fairness in interacting with these two countries. In addition, the increase in costs caused by the competition between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which had placed the two countries on two strategic paths of "reconciliation" and "competition", paved the way for China's intervention and the success of this country's diplomacy. The findings of the article showed that China's initiative in reconciliation between Iran and Saudi Arabia adds to the credibility and thus the international authority of China and paves the way for the beginning of a period called "Chinese Peace".

Relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia have always been fraught with conflict due to differences in economic, ideological, military and security dimensions, but these conflicts have been accompanied by ups and downs in their 90-year regional relationship. So that at every stage of the relationship, after a period of tension and disconnection, and even limited wars and conflicts under the influence of charm and a major turning point in the relationship between the two countries, they are moving closer together and peaceful relations and interactions in one They have had a temporary period. The purpose of this article is to answer the question whether the geopolitical analysis and relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia at different times lead to conflict or interaction due to developments in the area of relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia? The results of this study show that the relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, due to their fundamental and structural differences, influenced by internal and external factors, cannot easily eliminate this conflict and tensions between the two countries. Taking into account the historical relations between the two countries at different times and the complexity of events over the last year and a half shows that both countries are reducing tensions and moving towards engagement in the relationship.

The present article examines the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Khatami and Rouhani discourses. The main question of the article is what was the approach to de-escalation in Khatami and Rouhani discourses? The hypotheses that follow this question are as follows: De-escalation of tensions in both Khatami and Rouhani discourses has been the result of their realistic and pragmatic approach to foreign policy. The results of the research show that both discourses believed that the solution to Iran's problems and crises should be sought in improving Iran's image based on existing regional and international realities. Accordingly, both of them sought to put a review of strategies on the agenda while maintaining the basic principles and identity of Iran's foreign policy. Research method in the present study is the qualitative method (descriptive-analytical method) and the data were collected from library sources in the form of phishing.

The subject of this article is to examine the components affecting the creation of international and regional tensions after JCPOA. So the research question is what are the causes of regional and international tensions in the post-conflict period? And it tests the hypothesis that the US withdrawal from the JCPOA and its inaction has created new regional and international tensions for the Islamic Republic of Iran. The results of the study show that after the US unilateral withdrawal from the JCPOA agreement during Trump's presidency and the return of US unilateral and secondary sanctions, in addition to stopping the process of de-escalation, tensions between Iran and the Middle East and Western powers increased. Thus, the United States' non-compliance with an international treaty has led to regional and global anarchy and tensions between countries. The research method in this article is descriptive-analytical qualitative and the data are collected in a library method using phishing.