جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "legislative. system" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

Sometimes the basic laws of countries need to be revised due to the inflation of the laws, lack of implementation guarantee, lack of efficiency and up-to-dateness, etc. The main question of the research is, what are the solutions for reforming the legislative structure of the parliament in the constitution of Iran based on the general policies of the system and upstream documents? The main hypothesis of the research is that the boundaries of the legislative authority of the parliament are separated from the authority of the legislative institutions stipulated in the constitution and the government, and the position of the supervisory institutions should be modified in order to be efficient based on the general policies of the system (legislation communicated by the leadership) and upstream documents. The results of the research show that with the passage of a long period of time since the drafting of the constitution and the dynamic nature of governance in the Islamic Republic following new developments, there is a need for change and revision (due to the transparency of the position of legislative institutions and the manner and method of holding elections and provincialization) in it. It is felt. Failure to pay attention to clarifying the position of institutions and their decisions in the constitution has caused the inflation of laws, the proposal of many bills and plans, different misunderstandings of a law, and the creation of ambiguity and conflict in laws. Therefore, it is necessary for the legislator to pay more attention to this matter. The research method in this qualitative study is descriptive-analytical and the data was collected in a library manner.

The introduction of the philosophical concept of "algebra" into the field of criminal law due to the changes resulting from the school of research along with "authority" led to "punishment" as the most traditional type of guarantee of criminal execution, "social defense measures" and "measures". "Security" should also be included in the vocabulary of this field of law as one of the new facilities of criminal law. This challenge, which was accompanied by a spark of political opinion, created a difference in the choice of the type of criminal response, which is later referred to as the "unity of the penal system" and the "duality of the penal system." In the legislative sphere, in the Islamic Penal Code of 1392, the legislator, on the one hand, by repealing the Law on Security and Educational Measures of 1339 and allocating these measures to the crimes of children, adolescents and the free, and on the other hand, expanding additional punishments that sometimes have the nature of security measures. Has complied with the procedure of the French Penal Code 2005. This action has created the scandal of creating a unified penal system and related criminal policy; This means that the legislature has placed criminals under a system of punishment by limiting the scope of security measures to control them. The issue is different in the penitentiary system, which allows the reaction against criminal talent. Depending on the act, the degree of severity, the heinousness and the manner in which it was committed,