جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "nostalgia" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

In this article, films with the themes of homelessness and fear of consciousness in the thought of Suhrawardi and Heidegger are analyzed by asking the question of what is the origin of these themes. Descent and existence seem to be the beginning of the problem. The purpose of this study is a comparative study of Enlightenment and Heideggerian thought in the works of Fereydoun Rahnama and Michelangelo Antonioni. To analyze these themes in the field of cinema, Henry Carbon's phenomenological approach has been done by analytical-comparative method. The reason for choosing Carbon phenomenology as a student of both schools of thought is that his phenomenology is a combination of phenomenology and interpretation. Suhrawardi's anthropology has led to one of the most basic themes of carbon, namely, "Nostalgia" The present study shows that the original choice of "being of me" by Dasein and the epistemology of "return to me" by the earthly self will be the reason for the accompanying aesthetic basis of historical and meta-historical course in these two cinematic approaches. In this article, based on the origin and function of the concepts of "Dasein" and "descent", "existence oriented to death" in films with the theme of Anxiety and "existence oriented beyond death" in films with the theme of Nostalgia have been interpreted.

Nostalgia or "past regret" is a central concept in contemporary identity and political discourse. Understanding nostalgia and its dimensions and angles in psychological, cultural, and social theories reflects the state of despair and fundamental alienation and temporal-spatial displacement, the emergence of a kind of deprivation and longing for the past, and the focus on the past. Symbolizing and ritualizing the legacy of the past, revealing the past and distant and pure worlds and free from conflict, present and future confiscation in favor of the past, restoration of lost past, idealization of the past, golden exploration of the nation's past and Futurism means a return to the realities of the realm of identity-political nostalgia. The necessity of discussing nostalgia is that nostalgic thinking has taken root among some of us Iranians as a mechanism of psychological defense to expel unpleasant emotional themes and subconsciously rooted for relief, conflict, and anxiety. The focus of this article is to analyze the nostalgic thought in contemporary Iran from a political perspective. Thus, the discussion of why the past is sheltered and nostalgic ideas are discussed in an attempt to restore the lost past. The main question is what is the nature and functions of nostalgia and how has it been reproduced in contemporary Iran? The hypothesis of the article is that nostalgia, above all, "involves negation" and "revolution against existing patterns and procedures", by resorting to the past by avoiding existing problems and through Empathize with its legacy.

The interpretation of the political sphere in Pahlavi’s age, based on the nostalgia paradigm, is the scope and purpose of this paper. Nostalgia, as the fundamental situation of human mental life, can affect the political area by its own ideas, concepts and operation. In this paper, focusing on the period of Pahlavi, We intend to show that legitimacy, which is one of the basic concepts related to the politics, had taken the nostalgic nature. Nostalgia paradigm, consciously and unconsciously, had become one of the established and dominant discourses in Pahlavi’s age. Nostalgia was the point of connection of culture and politics. Nostalgia paradigm was so pervasive that even the formation of theoretical ideas and thoughts of competing sides could be achieved and fulfilled in the same paradigm. The generality of Nostalgia not only included the official, governmental and nationalist discourse, but also the rival Islamist discourses (And some other discourses). Nostalgia paradigm in politics gained credibility and legitimacy for one (government side) and worked in order to delegitimize the existing political system for other (competing discourses).
Design/Methodology/Approach: Combining the historical data with the adopted explanatory approach (interpretative-phenomenological approach), this article provides an analysis of the contemporary history of Iran. This combination seeks the means of nostalgia paradigm and uses Jacques Lacan’s psychological theory of the triple order (imaginary, symbolic and real order). Also, it explains the phenomena such as meaning, legitimacy and anti-legitimacy, identity and identification, self and other, and finally, presence and absence.
Findings: The problem of this paper is to analyze the relationship between nostalgia and political credibility (legitimation) and finding the answer to these questions: how nostalgia is political? Or, what the appearance of nostalgic acts at the political level and in the realm of politics means? There is a familiar and well-known response to these questions: legitimacy. But, the specific findings of this paper can be formulated as follows: Nostalgia is one of the most dominant paradigms of the intellectual, cultural, political and social life of Iranians in the 20th century; it can be claimed that the political realm became the playing field of various nostalgias. In short, nostalgia was the source of access to legitimacy and also delegitimizing.
Originality/Value: (a) Using a theoretical and methodological approach to review politics and political culture in the Pahlavi period. (b) Exploring the nostalgia as the dominant paradigm in the cultural, social and political space. (c) Exploring the political dimension of nostalgia in that period. (d) Exploring the dual Operation of nostalgic paradigm in the course of Iranian history and politics in the 20th century (not only in the discourse of ancient-oriented nationalism, but also in Islamic nationalism).

In response to the bad condition due to the political despotism, Pahlavi II intellectuals applied some statements of New Romanticism against current socio-political situation in their work, but since romanticism in new trend was shifted to the subjective and mental revolution versus European life reality, they couched to the imaginary world and so opposed to the modernity and its accomplishments. In readout of the roots of some of the principles of romanticism discourse in some intellectuals’ works, authors at this article emphasis on this idea that opposition to modernity and its agents in Iran, was largely influenced by the new left wave and so the slogans such as return to self, west antagonism and anti rationalism, comes from romantic discourse. In final analysis, these intellectual slogans in that historical period have no roots in Iranian everyday life.