جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « reformist discourse » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Just as the media, willingly or unwillingly, influences the political, cultural, social, etc. arenas and introduces new patterns in societies, they themselves are influenced by and influenced by society and its various discourses. One of these areas is the political and governmental system of countries. In any country, with the change of political discourses, tangible changes also occur in the media system of that country. In this study, the effects of three different periods, namely Reform, Principlism and Moderation on the country's press humor were discussed.For this purpose, Three hundred and ninety-nine columns of humor from Keyhan newspaper were studied using content analysis method.According to the research findings, political discourses influence and provoke the media through their treaties, interactions and actions and behavior. It was also found the Keyhan newspaper was often influenced by its policy and examines issues such as nuclear deal, political protests, US relations, etc according to that.

The present article deals with the rise and hegemonic discourse of political Islam in competition with its rival discourses, i.e. constitutionalism, traditional religious discourse and Pahlaviism. For this purpose, from a historical-analytical point of view, it has studied the contexts, content and causes of the hegemonic discourse of political Islam during the years after the constitution until the victory of the Islamic Revolution. Through this review, it has also been tried to tell a story about the relationship between the Shia clergy and the government in the Pahlavi era and also examine the developments within the discourse of the Shia clergy. The current article has analyzed the hegemonic process of political Islam by using the discourse analysis method. Based on this historical-discursive review of political Islam by using the historical contexts of the conflict between the state and the nation, the inadequacy of rival discourses and radicalization and as a result the instability of the ruling discourse on the one hand and by using From the charismatic leadership of Imam Khomeini and the creation of a metaphorical atmosphere like the umbrella of the revolution, in which all the small discourses and political currents found their hopes objectified; Succeeded in becoming hegemonic and establishing a political system c. A. Iran became Shiite based on ideas and teachings.

This paper has been developed to study conceptual transformations of the revolutionary in reformist discourse. For meaningful clarification of the relationship between the revolutionary and reformist discourse, we have resorted to Laclau and Mouffe’s theoretical approach. After the demise of Imam Khomeini, Islamic Revolution’s discourse - which had been articulated with signifiers of Islam and republicanism - experienced a new chance for presentation of different understandings and interpretations resulting in the emergence of two political rival spectrums of “Reformist Camp” and “Principlist Camp”. The reformist discourse encompassed such revolutionary slogans as freedom, democracy, legal positivism, religious democracy, human rights, etc. The reformist discourse adopted a new approach, claiming that the Iranian society needed fair and free relations with the rest of the world. The discourse was formed around the central signifier of democracy and floating signifiers of civil society, political development, legal positivism, freedom and moderation. Constituting a system of meaning, the reformist discourse tried to break apart the principlist discourse. On the contrary, the principlists created a new articulation and added new signifiers such as justice, security, values, cultural invasion, etc. to constitute their system of meaning around the central signifier of Vilayat or Islamic guardianship to dismantle the structure of reformists’ central signifier and floating signifiers. Reformist discourse created many chances for change in the society but failed to overcome the erected obstacles. Some changes occurred in Islamic Revolution elements as a result of the reformist discourse but it did not mean the revolutionary was totally wiped off. Rather, it means that reformist discourse paid attention to such factors as democracy, freedom, political development, and legal positivism instead of emphasis on such factors as justice. Indeed, it can be argued that the revolutionary is a product of reformist discourse and creators of the reformist discourse have always played an influential role in the political structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran after the victory of Islamic Revolution in 1979.

This paper has been authored to study manner of Islamic Republic of Iran’s confrontation with the phenomenon of globalization, in particular during the reformist discourse (1997-2015). The methodology of the work is descriptive-analytical whose data has been gathered through library research method. The paper has resorted to Chantal Mouffe’s concept of the political to find appropriate answers to the following questions: What approaches did Islamic Revolution discourses follow in confrontation with globalization? What relationships have emerged out of these approaches? Chantal Mouffe’s theory encompasses three relationships vis-à-vis globalization. The hypothesis of this paper argues that reformist discourse had paved the ground for compatibility with and resistance of the Islamic Revolution ideology against cultural invasion by adopting an agonistic policy than a fully antagonistic policy, whereas previous discourses had adopted an antagonistic policy. Findings of the paper indicate that until before the reformist discourse, there was a pessimistic view toward globalization and the dominant approach was antagonistic. With the start of the reformation period, the antagonistic policy underwent drastic changes and was replaced with an agonistic policy. Seyyed Mohammad Khatami’s idea of “dialog of civilizations” played a key role in adoption of this policy.

The aim of this study was to investigate how Iran encountered in the period of reformist discourse with cultural globalization. In this research, descriptive-explanatory method has been used and its data has been collected by library method. To make it easier to find the right answer to the main question of this research, "What are the views of the reformist discourse in the face of globalization and culturalization?" And finally, what kind of relationship has these views led to? The model of Shantal Mufa's political affairs, in which he considers three types of relations towards globalization, has been used extensively. The research hypothesis has been that before the establishment of the reformist discourse in the Iranian political space, the Islamic Republic of Iran's view, approach and relationship with globalization, especially its cultural dimension, has been a negative and pessimistic approach and a kind of conflict and enmity. With the coming to power of Khatami's government and the formation of a reformist discourse, the way of looking at and approaching the world has undergone fundamental changes.