جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « resistance discourse » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran led to a fundamental change in the strategic region of West Asia and to break the equations of the international system in the world and in the region. In order to explain the nature of the resistance discourse competition in opposition to hostile discourses in the strategic area of ​​West Asia - in the period after the Islamic Revolution in Iran 1979/1997 and the Arab revolutions 2011-2011 - it is necessary to present its important components and elements with a descriptive-analytical approach in a realistic way. The present article examines for the first time the realization of this realism in Copenhagenchr('39')s theoretical framework. In fact, political Islam is the main influential discourse in the regionchr('39')s recent developments, and its sectarian application is the strategic area of ​​West Asia. During the period of tension and turmoil with war, violence and religious and ethnic differences, this work seeks to answer this question to the effect of the (Shiite) resistance discourse on the hegemonic security order of West Asia in the face of Salafi and eloquent discourses. Apparently, Shiite supranational and transnational groups have reproduced the idea that they have the ability to change the order in the region.

Resistance discourse is function of the necessities of international politics in the aftermath of the Cold War. Different theorists tried to explain the resistance discourse against "domination system" by the different approaches. This paper is an attempt to explain the symptoms of resistance discourse based on various approaches. On the other hand, could consider other process whereby resistance anti-discourse "producing and spread by some theory circles and countries in the west. Perhaps the major part of thinks tanks in the capitalist countries, especially in the U.S., attempt to creation of resistance anti-discourse, and thus produce the necessary background for reproduction of the domination system.
This paper also examines competing approaches and corresponding as discourse and resistance anti- discourse. Real understanding of the system of domination is possible only in conditions that could explain different approaches of resistance. Naturally, every approach may reflect different strategies in line formations of power in the international system. In western countries and their local allies are emerged discourses In the process of dealing with discourse of resistance. The main core of such process should be production of approaches that can be considered as an alternative to the resistance discourse that be used against domination system.

The Islamic Revolution in Iran has influenced the Shiite political discourse throughout Islamic countries. Iraq is one of the most important countries in this regard. Imam Khomeini, during his exile in this country, brought about such profound developments in Iraq that resulted in major developments in the Najaf Hawza (Religious School). Then, other figures like Shahid Sadr and Ayatollah Hakeem, following Imam Khomeini's model, played a significant role in Iraq. Thus, developments in Iraq gain great significance for these reasons and for the fact that it has been part of Iran in its past history. The present study has been an attempt to answer the following question: How has the Islamic Revolution of Iran influenced the Shiite political discourse in Iraq? Based on Lakla and Moaf Discourse Model and Dispersion/Diffusion Theory, the researcher developed a model of analysis by which to test the main hypothesis of the study: The Islamic Revolution of Iran has caused the Shiite political thought in Iraq to be more dynamic, active and revolutionary. The hypothesis-testing was done with a focus on Saddam's ruling period as resistance discourse period and two micro-discourse periods, namely, resistance against terrorism and foreign occupation, and internal participation discourse after Saddam's downfall.