جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « آتش بس » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The second war between Azerbaijan and Armenia ended in a ceasefire after 44 days in September 2020 with the mediation of Russia. This article deals with the impact of the Karabakh war and the agreement reached on Iran's national interests. With this main question, what effects and consequences did it have for the security and national interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran? According to the findings of the article, the disruption of the balance of power in the South Caucasus and the resulting cease-fire agreement have had positive and negative effects on the interests and security of the Islamic Republic of Iran in different dimensions, the most important of which are: the greater role of Russia in the northwestern borders of Iran. The possibility of the geography of the conflict moving away from Iran's borders is Iran's acquisition of bordering lands and reconnection of the relatively long border with Azerbaijan and the like. The most important strategies facing Iran in facing the aforementioned crisis include adopting neutral positions and at the same time playing the role of active mediation to maintain and fulfill Iran's strategic position to the conflicting parties and regional actors. Active presence in newly liberated areas, increasing transportation and transit routes with the Republic of Azerbaijan, especially in newly liberated areas.

The Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire agreement, signed on November 10, 2020, after 44 days of conflict between the two countries, has had far-reaching implications for Iran's security and interests. With regard to this issue, the present article has been written specifically with the aim of explaining the effects and consequences of the Qarabagh 2020 ceasefire agreement for Iran's security and interests. In this regard, the main question of the article is what are the effects and consequences of the Nagorno-Karabakh 2020 ceasefire agreement for the security and national interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran? The findings of the article show that the recent ceasefire agreement in various dimensions has a positive and negative impact on the interests and national security of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the most important of which include; Russia's role in the northwestern borders of Iran, the possibility of geographical distance from the borders of Iran, the Zionist regime's large-scale weapons assistance in liberating the occupied territories of Azerbaijan and, as a result, the regime's greater role in Iran's northwestern borders, Iran's access to border lands The reconnection of the relatively long border with Azerbaijan has been the expansion of capacity to expand Iran's railway network to the Caucasus and Russia, and the presence of Iranian private companies in the reconstruction of the critical regions of the Caucasus.

Iran_Iraq war is the longest war between two countries from Second World War until now. This prolongation instills doubts into Iranian mind about it. Unfortunately, none of the researches has not tried to remove all doubt about that until now. The present article with the intention of removing of this doubt, seeks to answer the question that what are the causes of prolongation of Iran_Iraq war after conquest of Khoramshahr. In response to the above question the main hypothesis explains that according to the realism theory Iran did not accept ceasefire until it get confidence about removing all dangerous from Iraq and UN attempts to introduce aggressor. Our findings show that according to realism theory self-help is the only way to get security in anarchy environment. So, Iran couldn’t give positive answer to any poppycock where it was in informal fight to east and west superpower. Also, until territory of Iran was in occupation of Iraq army and UN had not introduced aggressor, every stop in war could respite to aggressor to get more power. Moreover,afterwards Middle East political events showed that Iraq is not reliable and acceptance ofceasefire could make conditions like Jolan heights occupation by Israel or Kuwait occupation by Iraq. We use library methods for this paper.