جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « اصلاح طلبی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) has been one of the most important political and legal treaties in the history of the Islamic Republic of Iran and one of the most influential treaties on the international relations of Iran. Overall, reflections on this agreement in Iran fit into two main competing political discourses of Reformism and Principlism, and it was represented in two different forms. Throughout this research, we have analyzed and discussed two media discourses of Reformism and Principlism, using Discourse theory which has its roots in the theories of Foucault, Laclau and Mouffe. Moreover, the used method in this research is Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis which includes three stages of Description, Interpretation and Explanation. Also, the resource of research data has been JCPOA concerned news headings of the newspapers belonging to the Principlist and the Reformist factions. For this purpose, the news headings that have been of cognitive value, regarding the subject of the research, have been chosen purposefully and have been analyzed. According to the results of the analysis of findings, the Reformist and the Principlist discourses using techniques such as Antagonism and Integration have had different and opposing evaluations of JCPOA. The Principlist discourse considers JCPOA as a danger for “National Security” and holds the Reformist discourse responsible for JCPOA’s negative consequences. On the opposite side, the Reformist discourse considers JCPOA as a step forward towards “Peace” and “Opening up the economy” and attributes JCPOA’s positive achievements to itself.

The present research was conducted with the aim of investigating the main elements of the discourse of the government after the Islamic Revolution of Iran, and to explain the main elements of the discourse, Laclau and Mouffe's discourse approach and descriptive books and research articles were used. Since every discourse has signifiers, the findings of the research show that the reformist discourse forms signs such as freedom, legalism, religious democracy, human rights, and having fair and free relations with the whole world around the central signifier of the people. They gave. On the other hand, fundamentalists have formed their semantic system by adding signs such as justice, security, values, cultural invasion, etc. around the central sign of the province.

The purpose of the present study is to comparatively analyze the political tendencies of the representatives of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Iranian Parliament) with regard to the institutional approach in the 6th and 7th terms. The main question is: what are the commonalities and differences between the political tendencies of the Iranian parliament representatives in the 6th and 7th terms in the framework of political development? The research relies on the hypothesis that the variables of the principlist discourse are based on political development following the progressive principle of Wilāyat-e Faqih and Iranian Constitution, the comprehensiveness of religion in the realm of politics and anti-hegemony, persistence on the basic principles, purposes, and goals of the Islamic Revolution, and continual realization of the ideas and ideals of Imām Khomeyni. The results showed that despite the difference between the representatives’ approach and function with respect to politics, within legislation and supervision duties, their political tendencies in the 6th and 7th terms of the Islamic Consultative Assembly have been towards performance in political development and so it has prepared the ground for familiarity with Iran’s political elites.

Investigating the political attitude of citizens is an issue that has a special place in our society; Attitudes are the basis for the formation of behaviors and actions of individuals. On the other hand, the issue of the importance of finding national and ethnic identities in the age of globalization is the most important issue in political sociology. In this regard, it seems that one of the factors that can influence people's political attitude is their national and ethnic identities. Given that experimental data has not been provided in this regard, it is necessary to measure the overview of this issue.The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of national and ethnic identities on the political attitudes of individuals. The statistical population of this research is Khoy city in West Azarbaijan province, which was studied by 398 inhabitants of this city by quota sampling method. The results of the research show that, firstly, according to the Mead views, there is a difference between national identity and ethnic identities, not contradictions, but rather a positive relationship, each of which goes up by reinforcing another's identity. Secondly, although these two types of identities are well-matched, their effects on the political attitudes of citizens are different. In this regard, the findings suggest that while increasing national identity tends to bring citizens closer to fundamentalism, ethnic identity reinforces the likelihood of individuals turning into reformist political groups in the community.