جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « وظیفه گرایی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

This article analyzes resistance based on the three theories of normative ethics. Ethics, in combination with politics, forms the basis of the political action of individuals and societies. Their "resistance" to dominating powers can be examined from a moral point of view. Proponents of secular ethics have applied ethics to the extent that it helps to organize the social system and make its citizens more sociable towards it. Advocacy of non-secular ethics in this context raises some cognitive and practical challenges; One of these challenges in applied ethics is defending the right to resist. Although such a right has been considered a normative principle in modern times, its moral exploration, especially from a non-secular point of view, can be an attractive topic in the field of ethics. Therefore, using the method of reflective equilibrium, the authors try to provide appropriate theoretical arrangements for the flow of political resistance in the field of philosophy of ethics and political theory, while explaining the conceptual structure of resistance ethics. Accordingly, in this study, the relationship between the moral right of political resistance and the categories of moral community,public interest and honor has been discussed.

The main purpose of this study is to provide a model for explaining the intergenerational voting behavior of Iranians with emphesis on Iran’s thirteenth presidential election, which was conducted by survey method and using a questionnaire. The statistical population of this study includes all 15 years and older citizens in Isfahan, which according to the 2016 census was equal to 2243249 people. The sample size was obtained using the Lin table of 384 people who were selected by stratified random sampling method. Findings show that there is a significant relationship between the variables of political Hobbyism, political conscientiousness, Political interest and sense of social belonging with respondents' voting behavior among the first generation. There is a significant relationship between the variables of political Hobbyism, political conscientiousness, Political interest, sense of social belonging and pursuit of interests with the voting behavior of the respondents among the second generation and for the third generation between all independent variables. There is a significant relationship between social belonging, tendency to make changes, social approval and the pursuit of interests) with the dependent variable. The overall results of the study show that the pattern of Iranian voting behavior is dynamic and not static in nature; More precisely, this model has always been fluid and transformed during the four decades that have passed since the establishment of the Islamic Republic, and over time it has been constantly moving from traditional to modern concepts, so that a new phenomenon called political Hobbyism has emerged.

In the present article, an attempt is made to introduce the important moral tendencies that are considered in the discussion of political ethics, and then it is discussed what should be the desired political ethics in the current Iranian society? Which model and theory of political ethics is more compatible with our society and how should this model be implemented? In fact, this research tries to show with a descriptive and analytical method how these two types of theories have affected our intellectual space and with what combination can the desired moral theory in the Iranian political system be achieved. The view of Islamic and Aristotelian virtuous ethics has been discussed in our society from the past and has maintained its authority and superior position until today. Theories of normative ethics and applied ethics, which include organizational ethics and professional ethics, have entered the discourse of the Islamic Republic of Iran in recent decades. These theories are briefly discussed. What has been proposed as an autonomous view as a result of research is the theory of professional political ethics, which is irrigated by virtuous ethics. This theory is most in line with our intellectual tradition and on the other hand also solves the problems of the traditional view.

Attaining consistency and coordination between morality and politics is a vital necessity for achieving a moral-oriented political structure and statesmanship. Therefore three schools of virtue ethics, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics are evaluated in order that their capacities and deficiencies are explained and revealed. For this purpose, the methodology of conceptual analysis and critical evaluation within analytic philosophy is used. The outcome of this study suggests that merely one of the triple moral schools cannot be sufficient to provide consistency between morality and politics. Therefore my proposed solution is to take some propositions from utilitarianism and deontological ethics together with Golden Rule to exploit the potential of these two schools of thought on the one hand, and to diverge from the contradiction and inconsistency in moral politics on the other. The point of departure for this compilation is a political morality which enjoys theoretical theme, and the applied capacity in the realm of politics.

The question of the relation between the concept of "right" and "good" and the precedence of each about another has been one of the important issues of normative ethics. Since the fundamental issues of ethics are not restricted to the personal ethics and the responses to them will be applied in political thoughts, the question of this essay has led to intellectual trends and prescriptions in political thought, especially justice studies. Studying some important western opinions and theories of justice from antiquity to the present by a descriptive-analytical method, the essay is supposed to illustrate that the thinkers ,whether they have faced the question of Right and good as a direct problem, have always tended to one side of the dilemma (right and good) and their attitude toward the dilemma had a central role in the formation of their opinions about justice.

Since political philosophy has a philosophical character, it is tied with other important branches of philosophy. Political philosophy has a closer relationship to epistemology, philosophy of ethics, and political anthropology than other branches of philosophy. The present paper, concentrating on the relationship between the Islamic and political philosophy and epistemology, is to study the epistemological dimensions of this political philosophy and to show that the expurgation and classification of the Islamic political philosophy is based on solving what kind of epistemological issues. The paper, first, argues that political philosophy is founded on epistemology, then, refers to some of the main epistemological issues which are the prerequisite of Islamic political philosophy, especially to their normative and value dimensions. Afterwards, the paper elaborates on foundationalism as opposed to the pragmatistic justification of political theories, the problem of the realizability of religious propositions, the problematic of inferring 'out' from 'is', the origin of our knowledge of ethical premises, and selecting teleology or dutifulness.