جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « self-determination » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Managers to apply correct and effective management in organizations, design and implement external and internal control systems based on their experiences and evaluations. Security self-monitoring is considered an effective and reliable factor in the prevention of crimes and violations. The staff of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army who are sent to long-term training courses abroad, manage and control their "behavior"," speech" and "attitude" by self- monitoring. The main aim of the research is " explanation of security self-monitoring of the staff of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army sent to training courses abroad". the main question of the research is "How is the security self-monitoring of the staff of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army sent to training courses abroad?" The type of research is applied, The method of research is descriptive and The approach is mixed.results of the research expresse that security self-monitoring of the staff of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army sent to training courses abroad is realized through self-knowledge, self-determination, self-management and self-control. The results of the research show that the staffs of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army who are sent to training courses abroad have reached self-knowledge through thinking, advice and preaching, self-exploration and dignity and by military self-awareness and protective self-awareness and proper recognition by analysis of the conditions and security threats of the environment and increasing the level of vigilance and intelligence elites should have control over their attitude, behavior and actions to avoid any violation and failure of protection.

One of the jurisdictions of the International Court of Justice is to give advisory opinions on any legal question at the request of the General Assembly, the Security Council, or any other entity qualified under the provisions of Article 96 of the UN Charter. Since nearly eight decades of operation, this institution has given 27 advisory opinions; a petty number, bearing in mind the concurrent evolution and development of international law and institutions. These decisions, though not having a binding nature, their review and analysis can greatly help to clarify and enlighten the minds of the lawyers. The advisory opinion of the ICJ on the legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 is the newest of these few advisory opinions, which by the way has provisions against the apparent interests of two permanent members of the Security Council (the UK and the US). This article through a descriptive-analytical method and in qualitative research nature, is trying to review and analyse this decision of the court. In the end, it has been concluded that this advisory opinion, though not binding, has shortcomings especially for not paying enough consideration to the consensual nature of the policies carried on by the UK in Mauritius, and the agreement concluded between representatives of the colony of Mauritius and the United Kingdom. However, such an advisory opinion per se indicates the fair mechanism governing the UN and its organs in observing the interests of the weak nations and developing countries.

The aim of this study was to investigate the political style of Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei regarding three components of "political citizenship rights" including "freedom of expression and belief, participation in determining destiny and party and organization" by "text-based hermeneutics" method. Was evaluated. The results of the study showed that Imam Khomeini's view and practice of freedom is a valuable view and approach, and he considered freedom of thought and thought to be the most important freedom. Ayatollah Khamenei also made civilization impossible without freedom of thought and expression. Considered. Imam and Ayatollah Khamenei have always emphasized maximum participation regarding the right of the people to participate. The Supreme Leader's view on partisanship, as well as basing the actions and goals of the parties in approving and rejecting them, is exactly in line with Imam Khomeini's political thought and style about partisanship in society. From the perspective of the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the principle of partisanship is accepted, but the important issue in the political style of Imam Khomeini (as) is the ideology, characteristics and performance of the parties.

On 16th of March 2014 following a referendum held under support and military intervention of Russia, Crimea declared its independence and unilaterally separated from Ukraine which was instantly recognized by Russia. Then after The Parliament of Crimea called for the accession to Russia and in a short time the accession treaty with Russia was signed and practically Crimea became part of Russia. The authorities of Crimea and Russia in Justifying their actions referred to the principles of International law including self-determination of the people of Crimea and implicitly referred to the theory of remedial secession in other to build a legal base for the military intervention of Russia in Crimea and consider a right to secession for the people of this region. Coincidence of this secession with political developments in Ukraine and dominance westerners over the government of Kiev strongly enhances the political nature of this secession. This research examines the legitimacy of unilateral secession of Crimea from Ukraine within the framework of the international law Theories. Also the military intervention of Russia and the use of force in Crimea’s crises will be reviewed. the findings of this study indicate that Crimea’s secession from Ukraine does not possess any legal base and the Russia’s actions in the process of secession and holding the referendum for the independence, due to violation of the principles of Jus-Cogens Like “non intervention” and “non use of force” is considered to be a violation of international law and consequently The “Crimean Declaration of Independence” Can not be Justified in The Context of established international law.

The 2017 Iraqi Kurdistan’s independence referendum and its results demonstrated that independence and secessionist Kurdish movements in the region would be a persistent political issue in the coming decades. Since their desire to become an independent country in geared in the fundamental right of Self-Determination, it is quite foreseeable that the countries which have considerable Kurdish minorities within their borders would encounter critical challenges on how to deal with their nationalist and secessionist desires. Iran is one of these countries. But the tendency among Iran’s Kurds to be an independent nation is quite lower than in other countries. The present paper seeks to answer this question: what’s the role of Paradiplomacy in dealing with the Kurds for Iran’s government. The findings of the article demonstrate that by boosting the role of sub-national identities, such as Kurds, and their participation in low-politics, Paradiplomacy can strengthen the social cohesion and social cohesion, in its turn, is one of the main impediments on the way of secessionism. At the same time, Kurds can help the Iranian government to reset its relations with the Kurdish population in the region.

Right to self-determination is a right for peoples and nations to determine their destiny and improve their social and political life. Self-determination is not a mere principle, but a right. This right belongs to nations and their individuals and has been mentioned in the first article of the United Nations Charter. Self-determination is the basis for creating peace, friendly relations, and peaceful coexistence among nations. In the light of the Convention on Political and Civil Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the rights stemming from the right to self-determination are divided into political, economic and cultural rights. The two conventions have established the right for peoples to determine their own political, economic and social systems. At the same time, establishment of a system under the people’s rule was among the main goals of Imam Khomeini's revolution, something that he always insisted on during his struggles against the monarchical rule. Imam Khomeini maintained that this right is based on reason and is among peoples' fundamental rights. He was also of the opinion that based on reason and International Declaration of Human Rights, all nations, in all areas, should be able to determine what they wanted. The objective of this research is to investigate the reflection of the right to self-determination in light of the Islamic Revolution, in viewpoint of Imam Khomeini in comparison with international documents. To this end, descriptive-analytical method has been employed in this research

Personal security is one of the key issues in human rights systems. After security, it is based on the three pillars of life, property and dignity of individuals, which means creating the right conditions for studying and upholding the rights of citizenship and humanity without fear and immunity. Since privacy, human dignity, the preservation of citizen's assets, the safeguarding of the dignity and dignity of individuals is important for the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and these issues are also important in the Islamic Republic of Iran, this paper tries to answer this question. What are the components of personal security in the perspective of Imam Khomeini? To answer this question, the descriptive-analytical method and library studies have been used and the reference of these studies is the collection of Imam Khomeini's (Imam Khomeinis) works based on Imam Khomeini's point of view. The findings of the paper indicate that Imam Khomeini has considered the issue of protecting and protecting the security of individuals, and his eight-year ruling can be considered a charter of civil rights and personal security. Some aspects of personal security from the perspective of the Imam include: the freedom of citizens, the protection of privacy and personal dignity of citizens, the preservation of the dignity of individuals in the community, the prohibition of torture with criminals and judicial security.The findings of the paper indicate that Imam Khomeini has considered the issue of protecting and protecting the security of individuals, and his eight-year ruling can be considered a charter of civil rights and personal security. Some aspects of personal security from the perspective of the Imam include: the freedom of citizens, the protection of privacy and personal dignity of citizens, the preservation of the dignity of individuals in the community, the prohibition of torture with criminals and judicial security.

The Creation of the Independent State of Palestine has a basic priority and it is an important step to support the rights of the nation of Palestine. However, there are numerous challenges relevant to this issue. First in this study, the right of Palestinian to form an independent state and the historical background of the crisis, including the measures having been taken to form the state of Palestine have been considered. Then, the necessary elements to establish a state from viewpoint of the international law have been examined.This study concludes that the right of self determination and the right of Palestinian to create an independent state have been confirmed by the international law principles, and have been emphasized in the UN resolutions. However, the most serious challenge rises from the occupation of Palestinian territories by Israel and unwillingness of Israel to establish the state of Palestine.