جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "تصمیم گیری گروهی" در نشریات گروه "علوم اجتماعی"

The present research was carried out with the aim of investigating the effect of team coaching on group decision-making and social responsibility with the mediating role of flexibility-human resources in government organizations of Ilam city. The research method of the current research is of a quantitative type, in terms of the applied purpose and the method of data collection, it is a descriptive survey.The statistical population includes all managers and employees of government organizations in Ilam city, which is 2500 people, of which 384 people were selected as a sample. The main form of data collection is the questionnaire.Data analysis was done by structural equation modeling method.The results of the research show that team coaching has a positive and significant effect on group decision-making, social responsibility, and the flexibility of human resources, and this research also shows that the flexibility of human resources affects group decision-making and responsibility. Social adaptability has a positive and significant effect, and finally, team coaching through the flexibility of human resources has a significant effect on group decision-making and social responsibility.

The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between decision-making styles of managers and staff accountability. The research methodology is descriptive – survey; and a sample of 213 individuals from the university staff population of 473 individuals by implementing the questionnaire of decision-making styles and accountability was performed. For data analysis, correlation and regression are used. Decision making style of Semnan university administrators with the average of 3.40 percent is individual decision making. All the decision-making styles have significant relationship with accountability. Decision making practices predict 47 percents of accountability. Administrators of Semnan university mostly use the individual decision making style. There is a significant positive relationship between administrator's decision-making styles (group, consultative and participatory) and staff responsibility. There is a significant negative relationship between Individual decision-making and accountability of staff. Participatory decision-making style of administrators is the most important predictor of staff accountability.

Since knowledge is closer to decisions that it is to data and information, it can help to improve the performance and quality of services in organizations. On the other hand, knowledge management is a systematic subject, the successful implementation of which needs determining and prioritizing different organizational factors. The paper tries to determine and prioritize the effective factors on implementation of knowledge management in IRIA based on group decision-taking methods. The research uses an output method, and is an applied one. The main research question is: What are the most important factors effective on the implementation of knowledge management in IRIA’s strategy. The main objective of this research is determining and proioritizing effective factors on the implementation of knowledge management in IRIA’s strategy. First, the related literature is discussed, and then using the statistical analyses the most effective factors are selected. In the next stage, using DEMATEL, the effective factors on the implementation of knowledge manageement are determined.