جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "فرهنگ ترکیبی" در نشریات گروه "علوم اجتماعی"

Special identity of teenagers, such as the way of dressing and makeup, which is contrary to the official training of the government, parents, education and broadcasting, has focused attention on the media consumption of teenagers. This kind of media consumption has taken a lot of opportunities from teenagers and at the same time as a source of identity formation, sometimes it is not compatible with other sources of identity formation in the society. Today, teenagers use the internet, serial content and music different from the values ​​and formal education of the society. The current research was conducted using grounded theory method, with a practical approach, and with the aim of identifying the role of consumption of cultural products of East Asian media (K-pop, K-drama, and Anime) on the identity of teenagers. 21 teenage girls aged 12 to 18 who are fans of K-pop, K-drama and anime were selected and interviewed through the snowball method (until reaching theoretical saturation). The categories obtained through coding are: two causal categories, two contextual categories, three intervening categories, six strategic categories, and six consequences categories. Based on the obtained categories, the consumption of these products is effective on various dimensions of identity: national, social, religious, political, and sexual. The analysis of the results showed that new combined identities are formed for the consumers of these products. Empowering teenagers, parents and officials in media literacy are important.

The sense of displacement and exile which is the result of forced or voluntary dispersal of people from their homeland is an important issue in the lives of diaspora. A wide range of scholars of different disciplines in humanities attempt to answer how diaspora who are evicted from their homeland as a result of war, colonization, or socio-political upheavals, can overcome their sense of exile and develop a balanced relationship with the environment, culture and language of their home and host societies. This article is a study of the two main approaches to the issue. The first approach is poststructuralist and advocates acceptance and appreciation of “unhomeliness” and “hybridity” in the age globalization. The second approach, which is advocated by scholars of Marxism and Postcolonial studies, insists on resistance to social inequality and reinforces the idea of “habitation” and insistence on belonging. While discussing the two approaches and their limits in relation to recent case and experimental researches, this article argues that any intellectual solution for a move towards emplacement would be valid only if it addresses and shows awareness of what Edward Said calls “situational complexity”, meaning the historical, cultural and geographical complexity of a particular case. Given the complexity and varietyof different groups of diaspora and their needs, it is their right of return to their homeland and the right of freedom of religious, social and cultural activities in the host country that determine and prioritise the strategies of emplacement.