جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « فلسفه اجتماع » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

Social knowledge, which was formed in the Islamic era and is known as practical wisdom in an important part, is a system of knowledge that provides special laws, theories and concepts for social knowledge. Knowing these elements can be the way to understand the language of this knowledge. Among these theories, there are many interpretations of the original under the title of "composition" which has been interpreted with different theories. Composition as a metaphysical principle has the ability to interpret various natural and unnatural components and elements. An example of these composition is formed in the human world under the title of society. In this regard, with an analytical-historical view, we have reread the formation process of various interpretations of the theory of composition regarding social reality, and finally, an innovative point of view in explaining what society is by using the united composition of matter and form in theoretical wisdom and the concrete composition of matter and form in The strategy is presented. As a result, its concrete combination will be an interpretation of the principle of composition, which is responsible for explaining the identity of the society. Finally, the general system that can express the concepts and ideas of social sciences of the Islamic period will be the practical strategy of that period.

The current study aims to evaluate whether the explanations of Allameh Tabataba’i in human social life aspect are consistent or inconsistent. His writings on this subject come into two categories. Although the first one has entirely philosophical literature, the other one has theological-philosophical nature. This paper used the documentary and library methods and shed light on the collection of written works of Allameh Tabataba’i. The method of the study has been note-taking of the needed data and then analyzing them through descriptive-inferential ways. One of the findings of this study is that he has repeatedly interpreted and quoted the principle of Madani Beltab’e (social essence of human beings) to the principle of Mostakhdem Beltab’e (Taking others into one’s service essence) that are inconsistent with each other. If the first principle of human essence is being social (Madani Beltab’e), a society is a natural thing for him, and he is considered a cooperative creature who collaborates with other human beings to survive. Whenever the first principle of human essence would be the principle of Mostakhdem Beltab’e, his first essence assumed to be a person who takes into his service and competes with others to engage more services. He is not inherently a social being, but is forced to have a social life to benefit more from other mankind’s usefulness.

This article deals with Allāmeh Tabātabāī’s views on the type of society’s existence. I will demonstrate that there is a contradiction and inconsistency in his views regarding this issue. While, explicitly, maintained in his philosophical work, Osool-e Falsafeh va Ravesh-e Reālism, that society has an abstract, conceptual, and non-concrete nature, Tabātabāī insists in his theosophical book, al-Mizān, of concrete, factual and real existence of society. Clearly, these two views are totally different, and incompatible with each other. This article deals with Allāmeh Tabātabāī’s views on the type of society’s existence. I will demonstrate that there is a contradiction and inconsistency in his views regarding this issue. While, explicitly, maintained in his philosophical work, Osool-e Falsafeh va Ravesh-e Reālism, that society has an abstract, conceptual, and non-concrete nature, Tabātabāī insists in his theosophical book, al-Mizān, of concrete, factual and real existence of society. Clearly, these two views are totally different, and incompatible with each other.