جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "dialectic" در نشریات گروه "علوم اجتماعی"

“Conflict" is seen as the essence of the employee -employer relationship in all conventional discourses as dialectic of polar and Hegelian type, where conflict is essentially transformed into contradiction. However, Simmel and Gurvitch attention and understanding of dialectic can bring about fundamental changes in the relationship between employee and employers. The discovery, recognition, and examination of the existing backgrounds and issues and their role in the worker-employer relationship are among the objectives of this research. The research was conducted using an inductive fieldwork strategy with a grounded theory approach. Non-formal observation tools were employed, and the researcher participated fully. Formal and informal interview techniques were also used, and discourse analysis and situational analysis were employed in data analysis. The results demonstrate that understanding roles in the relationship between employee and employers and overcoming the contradictory view of each party can lead to confusion between employee and employers. In other words, the emergence of a multidimensional dialectic instead of a unidimensional or polar dialectic recognizes contradictions and differences, and understanding it can distance oneself from the strategy of constant struggle and replace it with a strategy of negotiation. This strategy can facilitate the interests and demands of both groups.
 
Conflict of interest: According to the authors, the article did not have any conflict of interest.

This article attempts to identify models, including the conceptual ones related to social responsibility of universities through the meta-analysis of researches conducted in this field in Iran, and then, by showing the shortcomings of these models, on the one hand, the fundamental principles governing any form of conceptual formulation and on the other, alternative forms should be introduced that can realize the socially responsible university. This article focuses on the researches that were published in the last decade. In the first step, it tried to identify patterns based on the researches under review. Then, with a critical analysis, it was shown why it is necessary to go beyond the existing studies and think of alternative forms that can better formulate the responsibility of the university. In this research, three main forms of university, service-oriented (which itself is divided into two i.e. mission-oriented and citizen universities), and social university were identified based on the existing approaches in the study environment. These three forms were critically analyzed, so that the fourth form, i.e. ecological university could be introduced as a more socially-responsible alternative. Implicitly, we tried to show that the models and approaches have a fundamental role in shaping the research orientation, and thus the necessity of presenting alternative models because they create new theoretical and research possibilities. This research showed that without an ontological understanding, any form of social responsibility of the university can reduce aspects of the university in favor of preferred aspect (market or government); something that can be seen especially in Iranian academic researches on the social responsibility of the university. It is suggested that more attention needed to the ecological university as a specific alternative that Ronald Barnett had started to formulate.

At first glance, cinema is considered one of the aspects of entertainment, especially in the new age. Watching movies in cinemas, analog and digital home televisions, and internet televisions are platforms for spending leisure time and entertaining different social classes. The purpose of this research is to study the function of cinema in the representation of sociological and epistemological concepts, which deals with the case study of the popular TV series "Squid Game". The research method of this study is quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and the results of the research show that this series, using the language of art and using significant media techniques, has been able to draw a contrasting two-faceted format based on the eastern knowledge of "yin and" Yang", to depict class society and different classes of society. A society in which the lower and middle classes are condemned to serve the wealthy and upper classes. In "Squid Game", the main word of the capitalist system is a statement that forms the main suspense line of the story: "In capitalism, everything is a commodity and everything that is a commodity has a price." Cinema and art have the ability to convey the most complex reasoning and cognitive concepts in sensory and perceptive formats to the mind and heart of the audience. This series has also been able to convey many sociological and epistemological concepts to the conscious and unconscious of its audience.

This research aims to analyze the lived experience of girls who live and work independently of their family in Tehran city,  In situations where it seems that their personal gender identity and social gender identity are facing each other. Considering this confrontation and more precisely, this dialectical contrast can be understood in different types of differentiation, opposition, conflict, contradiction and symmetry, the main focus of the research is to answer to this important question: “what will be the final outcome of the confrontation of these two sets of definitions, for this group of girls”? In order to answer this question, the grounded theory method was used and 13 in-depth interviews were conducted based on Theoretical sampling and in accordance with the logic of theoretical saturation. The research findings indicate the existence of gender identity conflict as the outcome of the mentioned dialectical contrast. Although such a conflict is not perceived in the same way for all the girls and would be different in quality and quantity depending on the material and cultural identity-building resources that a person has. Furthermore, in facing the situations arising from this conflict, depending on the contextual and intervening conditions, a combination of solutions is used, which includes both solutions in line with the personal gender identity model (more modern identity patterns), and strategies in line with the social gender identity model (more traditional identity patterns).

The main purpose of this study was to investigate how to combine agency and structure in Archer theory. For this purpose, first the theoretical roots of integration are proposed, then Archer's theory of molding is presented with a comparative look at Giddens' theory. Finally, to the research question "What is the process of combining action and structure in Archer's theory?" Has been answered. She has formed her integrated theory by proposing the theory of morphology versus construction. The combination of agency and structure in morphology is as follows; First: pre-existing conditions (structures) that are the basis for social action. Second: the interaction that takes place in this context to achieve certain goals. Third, the consequences of social interaction that may lead to the structural cultivation of conditions of action; In other words, structures and agents are subject to change. Eventually, these agents and altered structures become the context and conditions for subsequent actions. Keywords: morphology, structuring, combination of agency and structure, critical realism, dialectic.

The purpose of this article is to introduce, criticize and evaluate “Spinoza’s in Soviet Philosophy”. This book is composed of seven articles of Russian thinkers about various aspects of Spinoza’s philosophy which have been written in 1920s, when the Russian Philosophers sought to reconstruct a philosophical system and there is lot of controversy among them about the nature of this system. Spinoza’s philosophical system was one of the main sources for them despite the opposite approach to this reconstruction. In 1952, The American thinker and translator, George L. Kline, with complete knowledge of the Russian and Spinoza’s Philosophy, chose and translated these articles from the different Journals of that period and published them with a detailed introduction. In this article, first, we present a general introduction of the work and its origins, then we introduce the content of each article independently and finally analyze, evaluate and criticize the various approaches.

The purpose of this study is to identify a solution to the contradiction between the view of electronic surveillance in the information society and the approach of technocracy to the privacy of individuals.The research method is descriptive-analytical, which was done through inductive analysis. the researcher used constant comparative technique to analyze the data. therefore, by deleting it, it is not possible to provide a definition of personal information and data and privacy of individuals. privacy and freedom of individuals may be in conflict with government oversight, but using the dialectical method, elements opposed to surveillance and privacy can be part of the information society. to be placed. to solve the contradiction between privacy and observation, we can use exactly this dialectical principle of marx, who says: dialectics, in the specific sense of the word, is the study of contradictions in the internal nature of objects. it causes movement, like the struggle of the working class against the capitalist, which leads to the rule of the proletariat.The theory of spontaneous order based on hayek's philosophical view, we can say that the existence of a supervisory society and its adaptation to the information society is not a contradiction.Wright's non-zero theory sees the result of the contradiction between good and evil in human life as ultimately in favor of good, and he accepts this conflict, and the non-zero theory validates the bad conditions of surveillance and private privacy.Electronic government surveillance of individuals' information, in the first place as access to privacy, violates the rights of users. however, considering the need for government governance, it is necessary when governments raise the need for privacy.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of differences in dialectical behavior therapy with self-regulated coupling therapy on reducing the emotional divorce of couples exposed to divorce. The method of this study is quasi-experimental with pretest-posttest design with control and two-month follow-up. The statistical population of this study consisted of all divorced couples who referred to Bahonar Branch Family Court in Tehran in 1397. 24 couples were selected by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three experimental (16 couples) and control (8 couples) groups .The experimental and control groups responded to the Gutman Emotional Divorce Scale in three stages of pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. Experimental groups received 8 sessions of training in dialectical behavior therapy and self-regulated couple therapy, but the control group did not receive any intervention. Data were analyzed using analysis of repeated measures variance and LSD test. The results showed that dialectical behavior therapy and self-regulated couple therapy significantly reduced emotional divorce compared to the control group(p < 0/001). However, the effect of dialectical behavior therapy on reducing emotional divorce was greater in divorced couples than in self-regulated couple therapy. The results of the experimental groups were also stable at the follow-up stage.

Hegel and Nietzsche are mainly represented as two opposing poles in the nineteenth-century intellectual and philosophical sphere. Nietzsche has been introduced as the fierce critique of the Hegelian dialectic and the radical opposite to the modern metaphysics that Hegel was represented. This image has gradually faded away since the second half of the twentieth century. Although Hegel is the peak of modern metaphysics and Nietzsche as the initiator of postmodernism, criticizing metaphysics, but the philosophical similarities and conceptualizations of these two figures show the falsification or at least the inadequacy of this modern/postmodern duality. In spite of some superficial perceptions, Hegel and Nietzsche are very close in their intellectual and philosophical foundations. We can read Hegel by Nietzsche and Nietzsche by Hegel. This is the goal Elliot Jurist has outlined in Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture, and Agency. But for doing so, he put the concept underlying his work, which is very important for both philosophers: the concept of culture. The present article will review the book from three perspectives: First, a formal critique of the work; second, a critique of the author's general approach and, finally, a critique of the Persian translation of the book and his approach.

This study examines the dialectical mechanism and absurdity, which have occupied the bulk of concerns of contemporary writers, thinkers and philosophers. Zakaria Tamer, who begins the song "Blue Coarse" with a philosophical vision interspersed with absurdity, realistic black criticism and rhetoric toward those influenced by materialism and machinations in this degenerate world where original values and ideals were lost. As such, the basic problem of the research is to determine the role of the text's semantics and its thresholds which help readers absorb the subject mentioned in "the Blue Coarse" to plot based on the theory of French critic Gerard Genette, who shows his critical experience of relations and transcendental transcripts in different ways. The most important findings of this study are based on the descriptive-analytical approach. The title and effectiveness of color, text, space, time, and the character in the semantic field based on the coding and displacement through metaphors, as receptive mechanisms, illustrates the ability of Tamer in the field of creativity and the reflection of absurdity that makes man depart from humanity and self-purity. Many of them seek to rebel the pressure and change the harsh conditions and others because of their sense of frustration and despair that are subject to surrender from the absurdity of life that is alienating, sinful or suicidal.

By an anthological critic, this study attempts to emancipate the other from the dominance of the subject (dominant religious discourse); however, the goal is not to reverse such a relation. But the main objective of this study is to show the fundamental relation between the subject and the other. The concepts which have been born out of theoretical articulation (Burger, Bakhtin, Ranciere) are based on the relation between the subject and the other. By this standpoint, the other is not an object among the plurality of cognition objects to be grasped by the subject. The other, in fact, possesses its subjectivity (cognitive subject), which is lost in every moment due to the mediation of special social, historical, political, and cultural conditions. The question is: What is the relationship between religious pluralism and the intertextuality? In other words, what is the relationship between religious tolerance and I in a social context? By examining research literature, we attempted to identify the relation of the other with the subject regarding the dialectic of tolerance and negation. Following that, we extracted a theoretical-conceptual model to provide the possibility of revealing the complexities of descriptions and analysis. Based on Berger's theory of religion, the subjects obtain a partial autonomy (against the heteronomy of classic standpoint). Therefore, with the help of a marketing religion, the subjects can look for their favorite goods. Through the mediate of this autonomy of subjects (Kantian cognitive subject), the encounter of subjects with the other is not of a one-sided and authoritarian one. Also, this encounter which is replete with dialogue and dialogism (Bakhtinian Dialogue), places the subject among different meanings and signs. These meanings invite the subject to construct logical articulations from the phenomena which rise up against the subject in the market of religion. The hierarchies that reconstruct the other as an object which lacks consciousness get deconstructed, and the other, as a subject, gets liable to cognition of plural objects (Rancerian Politics) which will, in turn, be supplied in this market.

The methodology of Karl Marx, one of the most influential social scientists, has been reconstructed here according to the importance of methodology in the philosophy of science. Today, Marxist method is also widely used by researchers of social phenomena, while a few of them are aware of this. Marx's method in the study of phenomena begins with complicated objective facts and proceeds to the more basic concepts in a downward spiral. Then, the path goes in the opposite direction and ascends from simple categories to composite concepts. This cycle takes place on both paths and at all levels of abstraction dialectically. There are two basic elements in Marx's methodology. One, the production condition in each society and the other, the role of categories in the bourgeois society. Marx's works have been reviewed carefully and methodological points from them have been extracted in order to understand his methodology. Putting Marx's theory under the title of a definite theory that is common in the social sciences is impossible. Here we try to give a systematic categorization of Marx's theories on methodology

Young people’s tendency to be different in Haraz street and it’s desired usage has covsed areason of becoming this street as a place for hanging round as a part of sural daily life.
So this study’s goal has put on investigating the reasons of youngester’s tendency for hanging round in Haraz St. in Amol.This study’s approach is qualitative.
We have used interview and observation for our data collection. Our investing community in cludes35roamers and 10 sellers.Generaly, findings indicated most of roamers are non-native young students and their main reason for hanging round in Haraz st. is to pass their leisure time.
The purpose of roamers is not to go out on this street to protest differces and expelit out of luxury of this street’s rich people. But they com here because of its acceptance for hanging round in this street by people, as an entertainment for youngster s, having not expense, familyanty and conversation between male and femal, making new frinds and being update about latest Fashions and prices.
But by successively hanging round, they have changed the nature of this place. Although it seems to be in cornrs of one special group (rich people).Regardlessof those things that spot for them, They have their desired usage in Haraz st.
However due to repetitive hanging round in this street, they are supposed themselves to math their clothes and make up with this place(up town) and make differences.

Present paper devote to explores the epistemology of view of Pierre Bourdieu and Morteza Motahari. This two thinkers with respect to their intellectual context and background, Each viewed with particular look at the issue of recognition, One with an Islamic philosophy insight and another In terms of Western Sociology, As everywhere in their thinking can be observed the difference between Islamic epistemology and Western epistemology. From Bourdieu perspective, Action intercede between The objective structures of society and actors subjective structures because their deeds are the main form of recognition. In contrast, Motahari calls,of society and nature, as internal and external sources of s knowledge which in a real organic relationship causes the production and transformation of knowledge. In this regard, in this article we are going to intend with a comparative study of opinions of both thinkers realized commonalities and differences in their thought and consider the issue of knowledge of their views

There are two different approaches to Montage among Formalists, First one explains montage as resolving of the material into its elements and subsequent building from them of a film whole (Constructive Editing). In the second approach, Montage is a Dialectic process to make meaning from a conflict. In this article, we want to compare these approaches and look for differences and similarities to unify two opposite approaches. First of all, we need to know how they approach Material of Montage (or Movie), Form and finally to Process itself. So we have few questions: How different is Material of Montage in each approach? Which Concepts are similar between two approaches? How can we unify those approaches? How different approaches to montage itself makes differences in methods of montage?
To find answers we will study Eisenstein's Film Form and Film Sense also Pudovkin's Film Technique and Film Acting and some of their classic movies. At the end of this article, we hope to achieve a united formal approach to Montage of movies.

The purpose of this research is to review the philosophical basis of Soviet Media Theory. The Soviet Media Theory is affected by the viewpoints of Marx and Hegel. By influencing the opinions of Lenin and the Bolshovik Party, these two thinkers caused the Bolshovik Party to impose special regulations on the media and oblige them to observe specific rules. By utilizing descriptive-analytical method, this research has tried to extract the philosophical ground of the Soviet Media Theory by using the viewpoints of Marx and Hegel. Library method of data collection was used in this research. The findings of the research show that Hegel’s viewpoints have rather affected this theory indirectly. In this respect, the outlooks of Marx have had more direct impact on the Soviet Media Theory and has caused that Lenin and the progressive party use the media as a consciousness-raising instrument so that the real consciousness would be transferred to the proletariat and, in this way, the way to final freedom would be paved.