جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « iran's legal system » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

Conflict of interest is one of the issues that may arise in any field and situation. There are different types of conflict of interest, from the conflict of interest between two people to the conflict of interest between two groups and the population. The conflict of public and private interests is also a type of conflict of interests in which the interests of a person or a group of people are opposed to the collective interests of a society. Now, there is also the issue of conflict between public and private interests in intellectual property rights and its global system. The conflict of interests in intellectual property rights is obvious, but the exact meaning and effects of this conflict must be investigated and proven. The conflict of public and private interests in intellectual property rights is caused by the protection of intellectual property rights themselves, but these conflicts must be managed in a way that does not cause the public interest to be ignored, because the purpose of granting intellectual property rights is not only to protect creators and to grow. It is scientific, cultural, technological, and ultimately the qualitative improvement of the living standards of humans and societies. Now, the best way to achieve both goals, i.e. securing the interests of the creators, or private interests, and securing the interests of the communities, i.e.public interests, is managing the conflict of interests and trying to balance interests.In this research, by examining the conflict of interest in intellectual property rights and all the capacities available in these rights, an attempt has been made to state the cases of conflict of interest and then find solutions to reduce the conflict of interest and move towards a balance of interests,at least to create a balance in rights.To get the intellectual property of Iran.

 The present study examines one of the issues of the international law of the seas, namely the government's sovereignty in the territorial sea. This issue has always been one of the topics raised in the international law of the sea. In fact, the main motivation for writing this research was to investigate and analyze the aforementioned cases in the international arena and the legal status of Iran's coastal state on its territorial waters. In turn, this research has tried to avoid any one-sided interpretation of the governments in the field of issues related to the government's sovereignty in the territorial sea, to clearly examine this issue and related issues, for this purpose, the existing rules have been tried They should be detailed and, if necessary, accompanied by a historical review, and among the ambiguous rules, they should be clarified as much as possible. In cases where there are no rules, suitable suggestions have been made.

 The current research is trying to answer this question with a descriptive and analytical method, what are the legal foundations and competencies of the Iranian government compared to the conventions of 1958 and 1982?

 The results of this research show that Iran's maritime law system is based on three approaches compared to the 1958 and 1982 conventions: a) Iran's maritime law system has taken initiatives. b) Iran's legal system has approved the legal principles and rules contained in the Convention on the Law of the Sea. c) Iran's legal system in the third approach, contrary to the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, has remained silent in explaining legal issues.