جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "social transformation" در نشریات گروه "علوم اجتماعی"

Social solidarity, as the most important part of a society, has a special and important place and in addition to its intrinsic functions in the management and regulation of social affairs, its existence is necessary to maintain and stabilize the socio-political system. Therefore, the present article intends to study and recognize its shaping factors in the views and ideas of Ibn Khaldun as a Muslim social philosopher and Emile Durkheim, theorist of social solidarity. Therefore, an attempt has been made to study the research issue in the framework of functionalism approach using descriptive-analytical and documentary method. With the hypothesis that "Asabiyyah" in Ibn Khaldun's thought and "interactions between individuals in the form of division of social work" in Durkheim's thought, is the main factor of social solidarity. Also, the starting point of each of these two thinkers is the degree of interaction and interaction of members in social relations, which in terms of the formation and continuity of the political and social system, the distance (rotation) of Ibn Khaldun's theory and Durkheim's theory are linear. It becomes. Ibn Khaldun's reputation as the most important social thinker in the Islamic world owes more than anything to the concept of Asabiyyah and its place in social change, which includes the five stages from birth to decline. Hence, it seems that Ibn Khaldun's social theory in terms of social transformation and its effect on the formation and continuity of the political system is of the type of rotational and conflict theory and Durkheim's social theory is also a monolithic and evolutionary theory. Although Emile Durkheim is known as a theorist of social solidarity, but thinkers such as Montesquieu, Saint Simon, Comte, Rousseau and even Ibn Khaldun in the Islamic world can be named who have focused on social harmony and cohesion.

The present paper investigates the relations between the state's discourse and operation in political-social transformations in the first three decades of the Islamic Republic Iran. The main problem in this study is the divese transformations of the IRI states, and The Question is how can it be explaned. To answer this question, histirical analyses were collected and refered a three interrelated level pattern. In external level, state transformations through Bashiriyeh's idea were followed. In mediate level, Kowsari's interpretation of Parson's theory about the pathology of subsystems domination were used. In internal level (interaction level, we utilized Tanhayi and Abdi's interpretations) of Herbert Mead's Social Evolution Theory. Finally, we found state ideological transformations, in the context of political subsystem domination, as the most important factor for social transformations, and social interactions were evaluated as ungeneralized. By this view point, decreasing the role of state in transformations, by depoliticizing of other subsystems and making social actions free from ideological considerations, is a solution for preventing divergent transformations.