جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « technology policy making » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

Upholding general culture for international competition requires a qualified higher education system and an internally systematic order. Rather, by relying on higher education, scientific production and distribution it is possible to update social value system in a given time and space at social macro level. From 1960s onwards, besides their task of transferring knowledge, universities became involved in knowledge production and research in various scientific and social fields, and even grew as socially responsible entities in the cultural sphere. Considering the fruitful socio-cultural experiences of Higher education in foreign countries and their critical impact for our academic organization, the current article is determined to explore the modality of cultural policy, administration and scope adopted by the sample universities under study. Based on ranking criteria, we selected Stanford, Chicago and Yale universities from North America and Canada, and Oxford and Manchester universities from Europe. The academic programs in different fields of culture, arts, community and public welfare were examined for each university. The paper ends with some practical suggestions.

It is necessary to design a model to implement Iran’s comprehensive scientific map. We applied the grounded theory and used 31 in-depth qualitative interview with experts and known scholars of science, technology, and innovation. First the primary codes were identified by the qualitative analysis software (MAXQDA) and were analyzed and revised until theoretical saturation stage. Then, the reliability of the research has been studied according to four parameters of acceptability, transferability, dependability and reviewed conformability. We have tried to explain the strategies to this end. Finally, based on paradigm approach, 40 sub-categories, and 898 concepts extracted from 980 codes were identified and the implementation model of Iran’s comprehensive scientific map was described and illustrated in the following six sub- categories: First, content support factors for implementation map. Second, organization and division of national tasks for map implementation. Third, national context and international environment of map implementation. Fourth, infrastructure conditions for map implantation. Fifth, strategic requirements for map implementation, and sixth, consequences of map implementation.