جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « بورژوازی » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

The central issue of Ashraf in reviewing Iran's history is to explain the historical obstacles of the formation of the capitalist system of the bourgeoisie and civil society. Ashraf to Description of the above problem has used the concepts of "Asian system" and "feudal system" in Marx's thoughts, and the concepts of “Patrimonialism” and “the Oriental City” in the sociology of Max Weber. As he has used the native concept of the "Muluk-al-Tawaiifi” to analyze some of the characteristics of the social and political life of the nomadic societies and their effects on social and political life of Iran. Ashraf, one of the representatives of the discourse of democratic and capitalist development pattern based on the role of the middle class or bourgeoisie. Ashraf's views on the historical barriers of Iranian society development are remarkable at three levels of political, social and economic interconnectedness. The dominance of Asian systems and the patrimonial and the Muluk al-Tawaiifi in the political arena, Nomadic, rural, and urban community associations in the social arena And the unity of the methods of agricultural production and handicrafts were the factors that Ashraf has raised as historical obstacles to the realization of feudalism and the growth of "national capitalism" in Iranian history.

Nefrin-e- Zamin (The curse of land) may be regarded as one of the most important novels of Ale-Ahmad, in which he reflects his social predictions and opposition to modernity. In this novel the author’s intention has been to provide the reader with a social analysis of his time. This novel is intended as a warning against the devastating calamities of modernity rather than merely a work of fiction. In this work, the issue of the Shah’s land reform could be analyzed within a special theoretical framework. Ale-Ahmad’s work contains different social concepts which could be explained in comparison with certain other related social views.

This paper is concerned with the relationship between Sadegh Hedayat and the Tudeh party and the party’s influence on his works written after 1942, particularly Hadji Agha. We aim to show how leftist discourse has influenced Hedayat. In other words, we demonstrate how a character is constructed by an overruling discourse and that what is created in this novel is not a real man in the real world but a representation of the rules which determine how he can be seen. This paper is concerned with the relationship between Sadegh Hedayat and the Tudeh party and the party’s influence on his works written after 1942, particularly Hadji Agha. We aim to show how leftist discourse has influenced Hedayat. In other words, we demonstrate how a character is constructed by an overruling discourse and that what is created in this novel is not a real man in the real world but a representation of the rules which determine how he can be seen