جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « نظریه بازی ها » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

Optimal assignment of equipment for disposal of targets, often referred to as a weapon assignment problem, has become one of the main centers of modern military thought. Weapon Target Assignment (WTA) is based on consideration of the principle of saving on resources, without reducing the power of systems and systems always to protect vital infrastructure. The critical infrastructure consists of the physical assets of a system, resulting in a significant disruption to operational and operational systems. In this study, a Stackelberg a mathematical model is presented to manage battle scenes. The Stackelberg model is considered to be a strategic game and an incomplete competition. The game is considered to consist of two actors (Enemy and Power), each striving to optimize its goals. Considering air and ground forces simultaneously, consider the assets of both the friendly and the enemy, including the innovations considered in this study. In this study, a two- level Stackelberg model has been presented and after linearization, the two- level model has been developed using Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions (KKT) to the ordinary one –level model. Finally to show the performance of the model, some examples are solved using GAMS software.

Choosing any device of the axiomatic system can limit the level of our access to the real things and consequently our knowledge of the world around us to the principles of that device. This article tries to examine this issue from the perspective of the philosophy of science and shows how this issue has been addressed in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” by John von Neumann and Oscar Morgenstern. For this reason, several main axes such as "rationality", "determinism the system of a game", "equilibrium" and "the principle of ceteris paribus" are considered as principles in economics and how these axioms are placed within the system of Mathematical axiomatic system of game theory. Our general view is that one of the reasons that game theory cannot describe and analyze economic behavior, in general, is that it considers the world as a single-order system, and therefore the causal chain in this system is very long, while Self-organizing systems seek to create multidisciplinary organizations and are therefore willing to add to the complexity of the system for this purpose. Mathematics has a tool called isomorphism to compare order between two structures, but there is no such tool in economics, and so we often do not know that we are operating within two systems with different orders.

Metropolitan areas are considered as powerful economic, political, and social centers around the globe that have a plurality of actors, and this has led to disparities which result in many problems in management of these regions. Tehran metropolitan area as the largest metropolitan area of Iran suffers from the same problems. Therefore, the present study uses a descriptive-analytical method for modelling and analyzing the relationship between actors in Tehran metropolitan area at a strategic level using game theory. The results show that the desirability, sustainability and balance that is being discussed in ​​Tehran metropolitan area requires involvement and establishment of senior government institutions and decision makers in the form of structural reforms and revising the laws and regulations of the divisions as the first step in recognizing the concept of metropolitan area.