جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Fight » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

Quarrel is defined as physical fight between more than two people, which takes place in urban-rural communities in various forms and types: individual and collective (tribal-kinship). According to Smelser's theory of institutional development, the main root of quarrel is in developmental disorder, mainly due to scarcity of resources, relative deprivation, traditional structure and conflict with emerging values and norms, rapid value displacement, social disorganization and finally anomie). The main goal of this research is to analyze the quantitative content of quarrel files (case study: Ardabil province). The statistical population was 80 dismissed judicial files of quarrel (assault and battery) during 2011-2015 (due to non-confidentiality of the results of the file).

The cluster method was used for choosing the location of the study and the method of choosing the location of the file was being of deliberate type, and the principles of randomly choosing the files’ registered number.

The results indicate that 85% of the quarrel parties are men and 15% are women; 42% of the parties to the quarrel are individuals belonging to the lower (socio-economic) class, 32% from the middle class and 26% from the higher class; and 62% of the quarrels occur in the traditional environment (rural, nomadic or marginal areas). Individuals who are between 21 and 30 have played the most role in the quarrels. The more educated the people, the lower will be the quarrel rate. Among those involved in quarrels 42% were farmers, 26% ranchers, 20% self-employed, and 12% worked with state organizations. Ninety percent of people involved in quarrels were those with previous records of quarrel and fight. Twenty-nine percent of quarrels occurred in spring, 45% in summer, 16% in autumn and just 10% in winter. The rate of individual quarrel is 41% and that of collective quarrel is 59%. Twenty-two percent of the parties to the quarrel did not know each other, 15% were acquaintances, 10% were close friends, and 46% were family members and relatives. Family issues with 30 %, supporting clan and relatives with 20 %, personal disagreements and revenge with 14% were the main motivations for quarrel.

The aim of this study was to explore the antecedents and consequences of community-based drug fight through a mixed approach.

The present study was deductive-inductive (mixed) of applied-exploratory type. The statistical population of the study included all activists in the field of community-based drug fight. 22 of them were selected using purposive sampling. A semi-structured interview was used to collect data in the research qualitative part and a questionnaire was used in the quantitative part. In the qualitative part, the data obtained from the interview were analyzed using Atlas.ti software and content analysis method. Also, in the research quantitative part, the extracted antecedents and consequences were confirmed and prioritized using fuzzy Delphi technique.

The results showed the extraction of 10 antecedents and 11 consequences. Among the antecedents, the effective performance of facilitators in attracting community participation to fight drugs, attracting elites to accompany community-based struggles, and developing the concepts of community-based counter-narcotics fight at the community level had the highest priorities, respectively. Also, among the consequences, community supportive action, participatory identification of drug problems, and community support in understanding drug problems had the highest priorities.

According to the research findings, it can be said that paying attention to effective antecedents, especially the most important ones, can play an essential role in the community-based drug fight.

Smuggling is raised as a major problem in the country. The major reasons for the importance of this issue is a wide range of victims of this phenomenon, especially where the health and food security of the consumers face a serious risk. Various dimensions of quality and quantity of health-focused smuggling, physical and health losses associated with the consumption of these types of goods and the extent of risks arising from the entry, supply and illegal construction of goods in the country, the right to food security and ensuring the health of the consumer reveal the need to take differential penal policy against health-focused smuggling.

This study is of an applied and descriptive-analytic research type. The study was carried out using rules and regulations and library resources and some decrees issued by courts. This study has an educational aspect as well. Findings and

The legislator has provided special and different procedural and substantial provisions for criminal negligence in the Fighting against Smuggling Act, considering the damages and widespread and devastating hazards resulting from illegal entry of these goods, and by adopting a differential and stringent penal policy against the offender and with the approach of support for the victim, by assigning Article 27 of the Law on fight against smuggling to this issue, the perpetrators of this type of smuggling are entitled to bear the penalties for smuggling prohibited goods.