جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Sayyid Qutb » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

Poverty and economic inequality are concepts that lead to different social consequences for human societies. The creation of this social phenomenon is due to the reasons that each social, political, and economical thinker based on his school of thought has clarified parts of it, and subsequently enumerated solutions to solve it. This article is shaped in response to this social phenomenon and wants to explain and analyzes the social causes and consequences of poverty and economic inequality and its solutions from the perspective of one of the Muslim thinkers who have widespread works to this field, namely, Sayyid Qutb (1966-1906). To do this, at the outset, the concepts of poverty and inequality are separately described from a sociological view and in the sequel, the causes of the creation of this phenomenon, its consequences, and its solutions are being explored in Sayyid Qutb's Thoughts. Indeed, in this article, it becomes clear that the deviation from the path of monotheism is the main cause of the domination of this crisis in the Sayyid Qutb's approach and his solutions for this phenomenon is determined.

One of the important questions of Shiite and Sunni political jurisprudents and thinkers in the Islamic world was the principle of establishing a government and trying to reach its most Favorable type. Meanwhile, the views of the two thinkers of the Islamic world and the leaders of contemporary Islamic movements, Imam Khomeini and Sayyid Qutb deserve to be recited. Both of them considered the only way to save the oppressed nations in establishing an Islamic state, but their intellectual differences and their struggle basics led to two distinct paths; That is, the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the developments in Egypt, which indicate the strength and the power of the theories of its government. The main question of this research is, what are the similarities and differences between the ideas of Imam Khomeini and Sayyid Qutb regarding the Favorable government of the Islamic society? The hypothesis of the research is that both thinkers disagree on the necessity of forming a desirable Islamic state (divine) and some of the functions of the government, in denying the regime of tyranny and tyrants, but in determining the form of government and its formation and ruling conditions.

One feature of contemporary works in the exegesis of the Quran is the supposion that verses of each Sura has a purposeful order—enabling the scholar to find out the main purpose of each Sura. This helps the interpreter of the Quran to have a comprehensive view of the relevant Sura as a whole, providing a systemac, interrelated interpretaon of the Sura. As a consequence, the miraculous nature of the Sura will be demonstrated. Allameh Ṭabāṭabāʾī and Sayyid Quṭb are among the scholars who have somemes concerned themselves with the purposes of Suras. In this paper, we will examine their views in this regard in order to discover the commonalies, and disncons, between their methods of providing the purposes of Suras. Their principles include: the orders of the verses of Suras are not knowable by deducon, rather there are fixed orders to be discovered, there is a miracle in the way verses are interconnected, and the text of the Quran is rhetorical. The purposes of Suras are discovered by the principle of contexts and that of the interconnecon of the first and the last verses.