جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « الفاظ قرآن » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

It was noted by the descent of the heart of The Bempergrami Islam (p. Dr. Ayati Az Qur'an), the reason for the mention of the good looks of The Door of The Door of The Prophet Boden of the Qur'an with contemporary Qur'anic readings by His Est. Dre J. Mas, Agarwei a. Az Anjai K. Dorma contemporary, Dansch Hai gededari Manand Zpanchenasi the appearance of his life, and bairsi descends and is inspired by the scienceof The Nis d'Nar Danch Hei beachen, the holder of the most important est. By the present, by the place of The Ruikerd Nashana Shanasi kiz Shahe hai Zapanchenasi Est, by Bersi and the view of the Qur'an Of Bardakhta and araan investigators, Gon Yakobsen and Ezutsu ra in bara is a resource for analysing the decision of Dada Este. The view of Isutsu der Bede and Hei, was a link to the side of the link, which is part of the aza sooso versted a great est. I'm not going to be able to do that. Whereis is Beangar and I have been warned by the Qur'an.

With the revelation of the first verses of the Quran by the Gabriel [= Holy Spirit] on the Prophet’s (P) heart and its reading [tilawat] and reciting [qira’at] by him for people of that time, he faced various attacks and suspicions on behalf of the pagans, Jews, Christians, etc. From the doubt concerning the possibility of revelation and its occurrence to accusing him of magic and being influenced by priests and regarding it mankind’s speech, etc., which the Quran itself has dealt with. This series continued until the recent centuries when Quran was attacked systematically by Orientalists under the guise of scientific research to prove the breach in the words of revelation or the distortion in the Quran and they have done several types of research in this regard. These activities have been done in the form of editing a lot of old books on the history of the Quran and differences in recitation [qira’t] or presenting academic theses or dissertations and parts of books or compilations. Due to differences in recitation [qira’t] in the Quran and due to the multiplicity of codices [masahif] and belief in multiple recitations [qira’at] on behalf of the Muslims, they have presented objections against the authenticity of the text of the Quran in some way, taking it as a sign against the stability and the originality of the text of the Quran. In this article, using a descriptive-analytical method, this claim has been criticized and reviewed.

Mu’tazilite theologians believe that the attribute “mutikallim” is one of the attributes of God Almighty. They consider it as an attribute of action and then God as the source of the word. According to them, the Qur’an is one of the examples of the word of God Almighty and His revelation, which is a creature (makhlūq) and an event (hādith). God revealed it to His Prophet to be a sign and proof of his prophecy. Some believe that although most Mu’tazilites considered the Qur’an to be the word and deed of God Almighty, Mu’ammar Ibn ‘Abbād al-Sullamī and his followers believed that the Qur’an was the word of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and was not a creation by God Almighty. In this research, based on the descriptive-analytical method, it is concluded that Mu’ammar Ibn ‘Abbād did not believe in the human source for the words of the Qur’an by the Prophet (PBUH), but he only believed in the existence and creation of the Qur’an. This accusation was made and used by his enemies, especially the Ash’arites. The Mu’tazilites, especially Mu’ammar Ibn ‘Abbād, like other Islamic sects, considered the Qur’an as the word of God and the Prophet as the recipient of it from God Almighty, and hence they did not believe in the activity of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) in creating the Qur’an.

Al-Wujuh wa al-Naza’ir (Polysemy) is one of the branches of the Quranic sciences which is originated from the exegesis (tafsir) of the noble Quran and it is revealed in the shape of the subjectivity writings in this course. The authors in this note which is to some extent named Al-Wujuh wa al-Naza’ir (Polysemy) have collected words with multiple meanings (polysemy) and their meanings and synonyms (words with different spelling and pronunciation but having the same meaning). But none of them made clear (obvious) their meaning of Al-Wujuh wa al-Naza’ir or at least it has not been recorded for and conveyed posterity. This created disunity among posterity about their intended meaning of Al-Wujuh wa al-Naza’ir and because of the definition of the second group which Suyuti is the most famous of all has been misunderstood it causes to multiply (increase) the different opinions and divergence about it. Now today’s readers confront variety of definitions and different and inharmonious notions that they do not know which are correct. This research with descriptive- analytic method tries to shed light on it and according to the authors’ opinion; the correct definition belongs to Suyuti and his followers; of course with the notion which this writing has achieved.